The chapter argues that although Beyleveld in his chapter, 'Gewirth and Kant on Justifying the Supreme Principle of Morality' is right to claim that there are important similirities between Kant's and Gewirth's ethical theories he omitts to also claim that there are also significant differences between the two theories. I address this imission in my chapter by demonstrating those differences.
|Title of host publication||Gewirth, Critical Essays On Action, Rationality, And Community.|
|Place of Publication||Maryland, USA|
|Publisher||Rowman & Littlefield Publishers|
|Number of pages||6|
|Publication status||Published - 1999|