A comparison between the RDA taxonomies and end-user categorizations of content and carrier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Resource Description and Access (RDA) includes new lists of content and carrier types intended to replace the General Material Designations (GMDs) and Specific Material Designations (SMDs) of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR), and which represent taxonomies designed to facilitate searching on content and carrier attributes of resources. However, these taxonomies were not constructed through analysis of end-user categorizations, nor have they been tested on end-users. This study investigates how end-users categorize library resources by employing the free-listing technique, commonly used by cognitive scientists and information architects. The results indicate that end-user categorizations of library resources may emphasize other facets, such as purpose, audience, and extent, in addition to content and carrier, and also levels of the content and carrier facets other than those represented by the RDA terms.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)544-560
Number of pages17
JournalCataloging and Classification Quarterly
Volume47
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

taxonomy
resources
architect

Cite this

@article{a2db18fd998c4558926c287c2780eea8,
title = "A comparison between the RDA taxonomies and end-user categorizations of content and carrier",
abstract = "Resource Description and Access (RDA) includes new lists of content and carrier types intended to replace the General Material Designations (GMDs) and Specific Material Designations (SMDs) of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR), and which represent taxonomies designed to facilitate searching on content and carrier attributes of resources. However, these taxonomies were not constructed through analysis of end-user categorizations, nor have they been tested on end-users. This study investigates how end-users categorize library resources by employing the free-listing technique, commonly used by cognitive scientists and information architects. The results indicate that end-user categorizations of library resources may emphasize other facets, such as purpose, audience, and extent, in addition to content and carrier, and also levels of the content and carrier facets other than those represented by the RDA terms.",
keywords = "Carrier, Content, Free-listing, General material designations, Resource Description and Access (RDA), Specific material designations",
author = "Philip Hider",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Cataloging and Classification Quarterly. ISSNs: 0163-9374;",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1080/01639370902929755",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "544--560",
journal = "Cataloging and Classification Quarterly",
issn = "0163-9374",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

A comparison between the RDA taxonomies and end-user categorizations of content and carrier. / Hider, Philip.

In: Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, Vol. 47, No. 6, 2009, p. 544-560.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison between the RDA taxonomies and end-user categorizations of content and carrier

AU - Hider, Philip

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Cataloging and Classification Quarterly. ISSNs: 0163-9374;

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Resource Description and Access (RDA) includes new lists of content and carrier types intended to replace the General Material Designations (GMDs) and Specific Material Designations (SMDs) of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR), and which represent taxonomies designed to facilitate searching on content and carrier attributes of resources. However, these taxonomies were not constructed through analysis of end-user categorizations, nor have they been tested on end-users. This study investigates how end-users categorize library resources by employing the free-listing technique, commonly used by cognitive scientists and information architects. The results indicate that end-user categorizations of library resources may emphasize other facets, such as purpose, audience, and extent, in addition to content and carrier, and also levels of the content and carrier facets other than those represented by the RDA terms.

AB - Resource Description and Access (RDA) includes new lists of content and carrier types intended to replace the General Material Designations (GMDs) and Specific Material Designations (SMDs) of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR), and which represent taxonomies designed to facilitate searching on content and carrier attributes of resources. However, these taxonomies were not constructed through analysis of end-user categorizations, nor have they been tested on end-users. This study investigates how end-users categorize library resources by employing the free-listing technique, commonly used by cognitive scientists and information architects. The results indicate that end-user categorizations of library resources may emphasize other facets, such as purpose, audience, and extent, in addition to content and carrier, and also levels of the content and carrier facets other than those represented by the RDA terms.

KW - Carrier

KW - Content

KW - Free-listing

KW - General material designations

KW - Resource Description and Access (RDA)

KW - Specific material designations

U2 - 10.1080/01639370902929755

DO - 10.1080/01639370902929755

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 544

EP - 560

JO - Cataloging and Classification Quarterly

JF - Cataloging and Classification Quarterly

SN - 0163-9374

IS - 6

ER -