A different kind of difference: Theoretical implications of using technology to overcome separation in remote laboratories

Euan Lindsay, Som Naidu, Malcolm Good

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Laboratory classes are an integral part of undergraduate engineering education, providing a valuable alternative to lectures and tutorials. Recently there has been a trend towards providing these laboratory classes through remote access-where the students are separated from the hardware and interact through a technology-mediated interface. This trend is driven by a demand to provide increased flexibility and opportunities in the delivery of laboratory classes to students, but it has the unintended consequence of affecting the learning outcomes for students in the laboratory class. Remote laboratories are characterised by two key factors-a separation, both physical and psychological, between the students and the laboratory hardware; and a technologymediated interface that is used to close this distance. Both of these factors have been shown in the literature to affect the way in which students learn, changing the contexts in which they construct their knowledge. The impact of these factors is such that remote laboratory classes are not simply a logistical alternative to in-person laboratories-rather, they are a pedagogically different learning experience, and they must be acknowledged as such.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)772-779
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Engineering Education
Volume23
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Students
student
hardware
Hardware
Engineering education
trend
learning
flexibility
engineering
human being
demand
education
experience

Cite this

@article{bbfe83443ece4e2a960176b74d423972,
title = "A different kind of difference: Theoretical implications of using technology to overcome separation in remote laboratories",
abstract = "Laboratory classes are an integral part of undergraduate engineering education, providing a valuable alternative to lectures and tutorials. Recently there has been a trend towards providing these laboratory classes through remote access-where the students are separated from the hardware and interact through a technology-mediated interface. This trend is driven by a demand to provide increased flexibility and opportunities in the delivery of laboratory classes to students, but it has the unintended consequence of affecting the learning outcomes for students in the laboratory class. Remote laboratories are characterised by two key factors-a separation, both physical and psychological, between the students and the laboratory hardware; and a technologymediated interface that is used to close this distance. Both of these factors have been shown in the literature to affect the way in which students learn, changing the contexts in which they construct their knowledge. The impact of these factors is such that remote laboratory classes are not simply a logistical alternative to in-person laboratories-rather, they are a pedagogically different learning experience, and they must be acknowledged as such.",
keywords = "Evaluation, Media, Presence, Remote laboratories, Transactional distance",
author = "Euan Lindsay and Som Naidu and Malcolm Good",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = International Journal of Engineering Education. ISSNs: 0949-149X;",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "772--779",
journal = "International Journal of Engineering Education",
issn = "0949-149X",
publisher = "Tempus Publications",
number = "4",

}

A different kind of difference : Theoretical implications of using technology to overcome separation in remote laboratories. / Lindsay, Euan; Naidu, Som; Good, Malcolm.

In: International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2007, p. 772-779.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A different kind of difference

T2 - Theoretical implications of using technology to overcome separation in remote laboratories

AU - Lindsay, Euan

AU - Naidu, Som

AU - Good, Malcolm

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = International Journal of Engineering Education. ISSNs: 0949-149X;

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Laboratory classes are an integral part of undergraduate engineering education, providing a valuable alternative to lectures and tutorials. Recently there has been a trend towards providing these laboratory classes through remote access-where the students are separated from the hardware and interact through a technology-mediated interface. This trend is driven by a demand to provide increased flexibility and opportunities in the delivery of laboratory classes to students, but it has the unintended consequence of affecting the learning outcomes for students in the laboratory class. Remote laboratories are characterised by two key factors-a separation, both physical and psychological, between the students and the laboratory hardware; and a technologymediated interface that is used to close this distance. Both of these factors have been shown in the literature to affect the way in which students learn, changing the contexts in which they construct their knowledge. The impact of these factors is such that remote laboratory classes are not simply a logistical alternative to in-person laboratories-rather, they are a pedagogically different learning experience, and they must be acknowledged as such.

AB - Laboratory classes are an integral part of undergraduate engineering education, providing a valuable alternative to lectures and tutorials. Recently there has been a trend towards providing these laboratory classes through remote access-where the students are separated from the hardware and interact through a technology-mediated interface. This trend is driven by a demand to provide increased flexibility and opportunities in the delivery of laboratory classes to students, but it has the unintended consequence of affecting the learning outcomes for students in the laboratory class. Remote laboratories are characterised by two key factors-a separation, both physical and psychological, between the students and the laboratory hardware; and a technologymediated interface that is used to close this distance. Both of these factors have been shown in the literature to affect the way in which students learn, changing the contexts in which they construct their knowledge. The impact of these factors is such that remote laboratory classes are not simply a logistical alternative to in-person laboratories-rather, they are a pedagogically different learning experience, and they must be acknowledged as such.

KW - Evaluation

KW - Media

KW - Presence

KW - Remote laboratories

KW - Transactional distance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548623071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548623071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 772

EP - 779

JO - International Journal of Engineering Education

JF - International Journal of Engineering Education

SN - 0949-149X

IS - 4

ER -