A Foucauldian journey into the islands of the deaf and blind

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This autoethnographic study integrates Foucault's genealogical approach to explore disability, notably deafness and blindness, from historical, social, and personal perspectives. Disability as a modern institution is defined through nuances of language and silence so that power constructs are hidden and continue to evolve through social collusion. Multiple modern circumlocutions intensify the sense of dislocation, emphasising the difference it attempts to conceal, which makes disability a ripe field for ethnographic work. The two men studied, Blind Brewster and Deaf Brewster, led creative working lives that found a small place in history. Both were sustained by a deep piety. The language used to hide disability in the contemporary world is more destructive than protective, in comparison with the blunt labelling of the deaf and blind two hundred years ago when it was a point of distinction, not discrimination
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)214-223
Number of pages10
JournalSocial Identities
Volume20
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

disability
deafness
blindness
working life
language
discrimination
history

Cite this

@article{2801f5c70bca43058211a0693dd63bdf,
title = "A Foucauldian journey into the islands of the deaf and blind",
abstract = "This autoethnographic study integrates Foucault's genealogical approach to explore disability, notably deafness and blindness, from historical, social, and personal perspectives. Disability as a modern institution is defined through nuances of language and silence so that power constructs are hidden and continue to evolve through social collusion. Multiple modern circumlocutions intensify the sense of dislocation, emphasising the difference it attempts to conceal, which makes disability a ripe field for ethnographic work. The two men studied, Blind Brewster and Deaf Brewster, led creative working lives that found a small place in history. Both were sustained by a deep piety. The language used to hide disability in the contemporary world is more destructive than protective, in comparison with the blunt labelling of the deaf and blind two hundred years ago when it was a point of distinction, not discrimination",
keywords = "Autoethnography, Blind, Deaf, Foucault, Genealogy",
author = "{Lazarsfeld Jensen}, Ann",
note = "Includes bibliographical references.",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/13504630.2014.893816",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "214--223",
journal = "Social Identities",
issn = "1350-4630",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2-3",

}

A Foucauldian journey into the islands of the deaf and blind. / Lazarsfeld Jensen, Ann.

In: Social Identities, Vol. 20, No. 2-3, 2014, p. 214-223.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Foucauldian journey into the islands of the deaf and blind

AU - Lazarsfeld Jensen, Ann

N1 - Includes bibliographical references.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This autoethnographic study integrates Foucault's genealogical approach to explore disability, notably deafness and blindness, from historical, social, and personal perspectives. Disability as a modern institution is defined through nuances of language and silence so that power constructs are hidden and continue to evolve through social collusion. Multiple modern circumlocutions intensify the sense of dislocation, emphasising the difference it attempts to conceal, which makes disability a ripe field for ethnographic work. The two men studied, Blind Brewster and Deaf Brewster, led creative working lives that found a small place in history. Both were sustained by a deep piety. The language used to hide disability in the contemporary world is more destructive than protective, in comparison with the blunt labelling of the deaf and blind two hundred years ago when it was a point of distinction, not discrimination

AB - This autoethnographic study integrates Foucault's genealogical approach to explore disability, notably deafness and blindness, from historical, social, and personal perspectives. Disability as a modern institution is defined through nuances of language and silence so that power constructs are hidden and continue to evolve through social collusion. Multiple modern circumlocutions intensify the sense of dislocation, emphasising the difference it attempts to conceal, which makes disability a ripe field for ethnographic work. The two men studied, Blind Brewster and Deaf Brewster, led creative working lives that found a small place in history. Both were sustained by a deep piety. The language used to hide disability in the contemporary world is more destructive than protective, in comparison with the blunt labelling of the deaf and blind two hundred years ago when it was a point of distinction, not discrimination

KW - Autoethnography

KW - Blind

KW - Deaf

KW - Foucault

KW - Genealogy

U2 - 10.1080/13504630.2014.893816

DO - 10.1080/13504630.2014.893816

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 214

EP - 223

JO - Social Identities

JF - Social Identities

SN - 1350-4630

IS - 2-3

ER -