A new perspective on the trust power nexus from rural Australia

Sonia Graham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many of the world's most challenging environmental problems are trans-boundary in nature, requiring the cooperation of diverse actors. This study aims to assess the roles of trust and power in achieving environmental collective action among rural land managers. The empirical example used is serrated tussock (Nassella trichotoma), a highly invasive, noxious weed that covers more than two million hectares in south-eastern Australia. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore relations among the suite of actors responsible for controlling this weed in two case studies-Cooma, NSW and Bacchus Marsh, Victoria. Interactions between trust and power were found to be useful for explaining the development of positive and negative relations among these diverse actors. When trust and power worked in synergy, land managers and government staff were more likely to share information, provide support and defer to enforcement. When trust and power acted as substitutes avoidance, disengagement, resistance and retaliation ensued. The author argues that long-term collective weed control will only be achieved when the focus shifts from enforcement to building stronger rural social relations in which trust and power work in synergy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-98
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Rural Studies
Volume36
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2014

Fingerprint

weed
collective action
weed control
marsh
synergy
manager
disengagement
retaliation
collective behavior
Social Relations
environmental impact
land
enforcement
staff
interaction
interview
co-operation
world

Cite this

@article{67b1303db1b645e082ca2f24015b3e44,
title = "A new perspective on the trust power nexus from rural Australia",
abstract = "Many of the world's most challenging environmental problems are trans-boundary in nature, requiring the cooperation of diverse actors. This study aims to assess the roles of trust and power in achieving environmental collective action among rural land managers. The empirical example used is serrated tussock (Nassella trichotoma), a highly invasive, noxious weed that covers more than two million hectares in south-eastern Australia. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore relations among the suite of actors responsible for controlling this weed in two case studies-Cooma, NSW and Bacchus Marsh, Victoria. Interactions between trust and power were found to be useful for explaining the development of positive and negative relations among these diverse actors. When trust and power worked in synergy, land managers and government staff were more likely to share information, provide support and defer to enforcement. When trust and power acted as substitutes avoidance, disengagement, resistance and retaliation ensued. The author argues that long-term collective weed control will only be achieved when the focus shifts from enforcement to building stronger rural social relations in which trust and power work in synergy.",
keywords = "Farmers, Interpersonal relations, Invasive plants, Natural resource management, Public goods, Social dilemma",
author = "Sonia Graham",
note = "Includes bibliographical references.",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.06.010",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "87--98",
journal = "Journal of Rural Studies",
issn = "0743-0167",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

A new perspective on the trust power nexus from rural Australia. / Graham, Sonia.

In: Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 36, 10.2014, p. 87-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new perspective on the trust power nexus from rural Australia

AU - Graham, Sonia

N1 - Includes bibliographical references.

PY - 2014/10

Y1 - 2014/10

N2 - Many of the world's most challenging environmental problems are trans-boundary in nature, requiring the cooperation of diverse actors. This study aims to assess the roles of trust and power in achieving environmental collective action among rural land managers. The empirical example used is serrated tussock (Nassella trichotoma), a highly invasive, noxious weed that covers more than two million hectares in south-eastern Australia. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore relations among the suite of actors responsible for controlling this weed in two case studies-Cooma, NSW and Bacchus Marsh, Victoria. Interactions between trust and power were found to be useful for explaining the development of positive and negative relations among these diverse actors. When trust and power worked in synergy, land managers and government staff were more likely to share information, provide support and defer to enforcement. When trust and power acted as substitutes avoidance, disengagement, resistance and retaliation ensued. The author argues that long-term collective weed control will only be achieved when the focus shifts from enforcement to building stronger rural social relations in which trust and power work in synergy.

AB - Many of the world's most challenging environmental problems are trans-boundary in nature, requiring the cooperation of diverse actors. This study aims to assess the roles of trust and power in achieving environmental collective action among rural land managers. The empirical example used is serrated tussock (Nassella trichotoma), a highly invasive, noxious weed that covers more than two million hectares in south-eastern Australia. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore relations among the suite of actors responsible for controlling this weed in two case studies-Cooma, NSW and Bacchus Marsh, Victoria. Interactions between trust and power were found to be useful for explaining the development of positive and negative relations among these diverse actors. When trust and power worked in synergy, land managers and government staff were more likely to share information, provide support and defer to enforcement. When trust and power acted as substitutes avoidance, disengagement, resistance and retaliation ensued. The author argues that long-term collective weed control will only be achieved when the focus shifts from enforcement to building stronger rural social relations in which trust and power work in synergy.

KW - Farmers

KW - Interpersonal relations

KW - Invasive plants

KW - Natural resource management

KW - Public goods

KW - Social dilemma

U2 - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.06.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.06.010

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 87

EP - 98

JO - Journal of Rural Studies

JF - Journal of Rural Studies

SN - 0743-0167

ER -