A non-systematic review of evidence-based practice within speech pathology in Australia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this non-systematic review, evidence-based practice (EBP) in Australian speech pathology research and practice is examined. Many Australian researchers are contributing to the theoretical evidence through systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials, and other clinical research. Additionally, Australian researchers are integrating international theoretical evidence via speechBITE' and other initiatives. Australian speech pathologists' clinical expertise is supported via Speech Pathology Australia and an example of the implementation of EBP in clinical contexts is the NSW EBP Network. Within Australia, research attention has been directed towards the client's choice and the client's voice. This paper acknowledges limitations of implementing EBP in Australia: suggesting that inclusion of the client's voice could be formalised and that additional research needs to be undertaken to address practical differences in service delivery models between Australian and international contexts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16-19
Number of pages4
JournalThe South African journal of communication disorders. Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings
Volume55
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Speech-Language Pathology
Evidence-Based Practice
Research
Research Personnel
Randomized Controlled Trials

Cite this

@article{880546ef81a3419ca7eae7a2b62e4a6e,
title = "A non-systematic review of evidence-based practice within speech pathology in Australia",
abstract = "In this non-systematic review, evidence-based practice (EBP) in Australian speech pathology research and practice is examined. Many Australian researchers are contributing to the theoretical evidence through systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials, and other clinical research. Additionally, Australian researchers are integrating international theoretical evidence via speechBITE' and other initiatives. Australian speech pathologists' clinical expertise is supported via Speech Pathology Australia and an example of the implementation of EBP in clinical contexts is the NSW EBP Network. Within Australia, research attention has been directed towards the client's choice and the client's voice. This paper acknowledges limitations of implementing EBP in Australia: suggesting that inclusion of the client's voice could be formalised and that additional research needs to be undertaken to address practical differences in service delivery models between Australian and international contexts.",
keywords = "Australia, Evidence-based practice, ICF, Professional practice, Speech-language pathology",
author = "Sharynne McLeod",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = South African Journal of Communication Disorders. ISSNs: 0379-8046;",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "16--19",
journal = "The South African journal of communication disorders. Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings",
issn = "0379-8046",
publisher = "South African Speech And Hearing Association",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A non-systematic review of evidence-based practice within speech pathology in Australia

AU - McLeod, Sharynne

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = South African Journal of Communication Disorders. ISSNs: 0379-8046;

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - In this non-systematic review, evidence-based practice (EBP) in Australian speech pathology research and practice is examined. Many Australian researchers are contributing to the theoretical evidence through systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials, and other clinical research. Additionally, Australian researchers are integrating international theoretical evidence via speechBITE' and other initiatives. Australian speech pathologists' clinical expertise is supported via Speech Pathology Australia and an example of the implementation of EBP in clinical contexts is the NSW EBP Network. Within Australia, research attention has been directed towards the client's choice and the client's voice. This paper acknowledges limitations of implementing EBP in Australia: suggesting that inclusion of the client's voice could be formalised and that additional research needs to be undertaken to address practical differences in service delivery models between Australian and international contexts.

AB - In this non-systematic review, evidence-based practice (EBP) in Australian speech pathology research and practice is examined. Many Australian researchers are contributing to the theoretical evidence through systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials, and other clinical research. Additionally, Australian researchers are integrating international theoretical evidence via speechBITE' and other initiatives. Australian speech pathologists' clinical expertise is supported via Speech Pathology Australia and an example of the implementation of EBP in clinical contexts is the NSW EBP Network. Within Australia, research attention has been directed towards the client's choice and the client's voice. This paper acknowledges limitations of implementing EBP in Australia: suggesting that inclusion of the client's voice could be formalised and that additional research needs to be undertaken to address practical differences in service delivery models between Australian and international contexts.

KW - Australia

KW - Evidence-based practice

KW - ICF

KW - Professional practice

KW - Speech-language pathology

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 16

EP - 19

JO - The South African journal of communication disorders. Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings

JF - The South African journal of communication disorders. Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings

SN - 0379-8046

ER -