TY - JOUR
T1 - A Review of beta2 -glycoprotein-l antibody testing results from a peer-driven multilaboratory quality assurance program
AU - Favaloro, Emmanuel J
AU - Wong, Richard C W
AU - Jovanovich, Susan
AU - Roberts-Thomson, Peter
PY - 2007/3
Y1 - 2007/3
N2 - We evaluated the results of lgG beta2-glycoprotein-I (B2GPI) antibody assays in a multilaboratory setting by analyzing data from an external quality assurance program for the 2003 through 2005 cycles for 27 serum samples, including quantitative IgG-B2GPI values and qualitative interpretation and grading (ie, negative or positive; grade of positivity), according to method type and in conjunction with clinical data. We report high interlaboratory variation in numeric IgG-B2GPI results, comparable to that reported for IgG anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) testing, and some method-based variation. For example, interlaboratory coefficients of variation for IgG-B2GPI were more than 50% in 19 samples (70%). For qualitative reporting, there was generally better consensus than previously reported for semiquantitative IgG-aCL testing; although 100% consensus occurred for only 11 samples (41%), more than 90% of laboratories agreed for 19 samples (70%). In some cases, laboratory findings (negative or positive IgG-B2GPI) did not agree with clinical information. Despite the lack of formal standardization for IgG-B2GPI testing compared with IgG-aCL, there seems to be better cross-laboratory consensus. Improvement in standardization of these assays is still required to improve interlaboratory and intermethod concordance of results and interpretation between laboratories and the clinical usefulness of IgG-B2GPI testing.
AB - We evaluated the results of lgG beta2-glycoprotein-I (B2GPI) antibody assays in a multilaboratory setting by analyzing data from an external quality assurance program for the 2003 through 2005 cycles for 27 serum samples, including quantitative IgG-B2GPI values and qualitative interpretation and grading (ie, negative or positive; grade of positivity), according to method type and in conjunction with clinical data. We report high interlaboratory variation in numeric IgG-B2GPI results, comparable to that reported for IgG anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) testing, and some method-based variation. For example, interlaboratory coefficients of variation for IgG-B2GPI were more than 50% in 19 samples (70%). For qualitative reporting, there was generally better consensus than previously reported for semiquantitative IgG-aCL testing; although 100% consensus occurred for only 11 samples (41%), more than 90% of laboratories agreed for 19 samples (70%). In some cases, laboratory findings (negative or positive IgG-B2GPI) did not agree with clinical information. Despite the lack of formal standardization for IgG-B2GPI testing compared with IgG-aCL, there seems to be better cross-laboratory consensus. Improvement in standardization of these assays is still required to improve interlaboratory and intermethod concordance of results and interpretation between laboratories and the clinical usefulness of IgG-B2GPI testing.
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Antibodies, Anticardiolipin/blood
KW - Autoantibodies/blood
KW - Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Immunoglobulin G/blood
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Quality Control
KW - Reference Standards
KW - Reference Values
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - beta 2-Glycoprotein I/immunology
U2 - 10.1309/L78KJ01CHQM4MK37
DO - 10.1309/L78KJ01CHQM4MK37
M3 - Article
C2 - 17276935
SN - 0002-9173
VL - 127
SP - 441
EP - 448
JO - American Journal of Clinical Pathology
JF - American Journal of Clinical Pathology
IS - 3
ER -