A review of the adequacy of reporting to the Ramsar Convention on change in the ecological character of wetlands

N. C. Davidson, L. Dinesen, S. Fennessy, Max Finlayson, P. Grillas, A. Grobicki, R. J. McInnes, D. A. Stroud

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We review the mechanisms established by the Ramsar Convention for reporting on the status and change in the ecological character of wetlands. We assess the extent of their implementation and compliance, but not issues of the adequacy of their design nor the consequences of their extent of implementation. We conclude that, with the exception of qualitative national-scale reporting in triennial Contracting Party National Reports, there is inadequate implementation and compliance with most of these mechanisms, notably concerning required reporting under Article 3.2 of the Convention and the updating of the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS). This limits the ability of the Convention to assess the status, and trends in status, of designated Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Sites), and to inform future decision-making and priority-setting for the wise use of all wetlands. As has been recognised by the Ramsar Convention, unless compliance with these mechanisms is improved, sufficient information will not be gathered through the mechanisms of Ramsar Convention to assess fully the Sustainable Development Goal 6.6.1 indicator supported by the Convention on change in the extent of water-related ecosystems over time.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-126
Number of pages10
JournalMarine and Freshwater Research
Volume71
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 03 Dec 2019

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A review of the adequacy of reporting to the Ramsar Convention on change in the ecological character of wetlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this