TY - JOUR
T1 - A short form of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale suitable for clinical use
T2 - The SSQ12
AU - Noble, William
AU - Jensen, Niels Sogaard
AU - Naylor, Graham
AU - Bhullar, Navjot
AU - Akeroyd, Michael A.
PY - 2013/6
Y1 - 2013/6
N2 - Objective: To develop and evaluate a 12-item version of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale for use in clinical research and rehabilitation settings, and provide a formula for converting scores between the full (SSQ49) and abbreviated (SSQ12) versions. Design: Items were selected independently at the three centres (Eriksholm Research Centre, MRC Institute of Hearing Research, University of New England) to be representative of the complete scale. A consensus was achieved after discussion. Study sample: The data set (n = 1220) used for a factor analysis (Akeroyd et al, submitted) was re-analysed to compare original SSQ scores (SSQ49) with scores on the short version (SSQ12). Results: A scatter-plot of SSQ12 scores against SSQ49 scores showed that SSQ12 score was about 0.6 of a scale point lower than the SSQ49 (0-10 scale) in the re-analysis of the Akeroyd et al data. SSQ12 scores lay on a slightly steeper slope than scores on the SSQ49. Conclusions: The SSQ12 provides similar results to SSQ49 in a large clinical research sample. The slightly lower average SSQ12 score and the slightly steeper slope reflect the composition of this short form relative to the SSQ49.
AB - Objective: To develop and evaluate a 12-item version of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale for use in clinical research and rehabilitation settings, and provide a formula for converting scores between the full (SSQ49) and abbreviated (SSQ12) versions. Design: Items were selected independently at the three centres (Eriksholm Research Centre, MRC Institute of Hearing Research, University of New England) to be representative of the complete scale. A consensus was achieved after discussion. Study sample: The data set (n = 1220) used for a factor analysis (Akeroyd et al, submitted) was re-analysed to compare original SSQ scores (SSQ49) with scores on the short version (SSQ12). Results: A scatter-plot of SSQ12 scores against SSQ49 scores showed that SSQ12 score was about 0.6 of a scale point lower than the SSQ49 (0-10 scale) in the re-analysis of the Akeroyd et al data. SSQ12 scores lay on a slightly steeper slope than scores on the SSQ49. Conclusions: The SSQ12 provides similar results to SSQ49 in a large clinical research sample. The slightly lower average SSQ12 score and the slightly steeper slope reflect the composition of this short form relative to the SSQ49.
KW - Clinical use
KW - Short version
KW - Spatial and qualities of hearing scale
KW - Speech
KW - SSQ
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877602536&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877602536&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/14992027.2013.781278
DO - 10.3109/14992027.2013.781278
M3 - Article
C2 - 23651462
AN - SCOPUS:84877602536
SN - 1499-2027
VL - 52
SP - 409
EP - 412
JO - International Journal of Audiology
JF - International Journal of Audiology
IS - 6
ER -