A sporting chance: workplace ethnographies, ethics protocols and playing by the rules

Jennifer Sappey

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperChapter

13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This is a researcher's story of her student adventures into workplace ethnography. First, is the tale of participant observation of the Queensland commercial fitness industry which in the early 1990s was one of the last 'award free' industries in Queensland. My club membership paid and my access secured, my conservative business suit discarded for spangled leotards and the latest pumps, I went to work. These were the days prior to restrictions on workplace ethnography introduced by the Australian national ethics protocols in 1999. I was free to follow leads as they appeared and to report my own observations as just another participant at the gym. Little could I have expected that my observations of the conditions of employment of one particular fitness centre would mushroom into a full-scale industry analysis, as employers took the extraordinary step of discarding self regulation and sought a formal industrial award. In May 1994 I sat alone in the public gallery of the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission, conspicuously the only witness to what, at face value, simply did not make sense: private-enterprise employers seeking to have government regulate their relationship with their workers. It seemed liked a researcher's manna from heaven.Second, is a contrasting tale of doctoral research into the changing nature of work for academics in Australian universities in 2000. Unlike the freedom of research design and procedures from my fitness industry study which chased down leads as they appeared, the newly introduced national research ethics protocols with their restrictions on access, design and procedures were compromising the integrity of the research and even threatening to curb the project outright. The challenge was just how to retrieve the research project and still play by the rules, even though the ethics regulations hardly seemed to offer a sporting chance to a workplace ethnographer.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMethod in the Madness?
Subtitle of host publicationResearch stories you won't read in a textbook
EditorsKeith Townsend, John Burgess
Place of PublicationOxford
PublisherChandos Publishing
Pages135-145
Number of pages11
Edition11
ISBN (Print)9781843344933
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

ethnography
workplace
fitness
moral philosophy
industry
employer
private enterprise
industrial relations
research ethics
self-regulation
club
participant observation
witness
research planning
integrity
research project
worker
regulation
university
student

Cite this

Sappey, J. (2009). A sporting chance: workplace ethnographies, ethics protocols and playing by the rules. In K. Townsend, & J. Burgess (Eds.), Method in the Madness?: Research stories you won't read in a textbook (11 ed., pp. 135-145). Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
Sappey, Jennifer. / A sporting chance : workplace ethnographies, ethics protocols and playing by the rules. Method in the Madness?: Research stories you won't read in a textbook. editor / Keith Townsend ; John Burgess. 11. ed. Oxford : Chandos Publishing, 2009. pp. 135-145
@inbook{b9318055546e40c9b54b68d4d70eb34e,
title = "A sporting chance: workplace ethnographies, ethics protocols and playing by the rules",
abstract = "This is a researcher's story of her student adventures into workplace ethnography. First, is the tale of participant observation of the Queensland commercial fitness industry which in the early 1990s was one of the last 'award free' industries in Queensland. My club membership paid and my access secured, my conservative business suit discarded for spangled leotards and the latest pumps, I went to work. These were the days prior to restrictions on workplace ethnography introduced by the Australian national ethics protocols in 1999. I was free to follow leads as they appeared and to report my own observations as just another participant at the gym. Little could I have expected that my observations of the conditions of employment of one particular fitness centre would mushroom into a full-scale industry analysis, as employers took the extraordinary step of discarding self regulation and sought a formal industrial award. In May 1994 I sat alone in the public gallery of the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission, conspicuously the only witness to what, at face value, simply did not make sense: private-enterprise employers seeking to have government regulate their relationship with their workers. It seemed liked a researcher's manna from heaven.Second, is a contrasting tale of doctoral research into the changing nature of work for academics in Australian universities in 2000. Unlike the freedom of research design and procedures from my fitness industry study which chased down leads as they appeared, the newly introduced national research ethics protocols with their restrictions on access, design and procedures were compromising the integrity of the research and even threatening to curb the project outright. The challenge was just how to retrieve the research project and still play by the rules, even though the ethics regulations hardly seemed to offer a sporting chance to a workplace ethnographer.",
keywords = "Open access version available, Ethnography, Methodology, Research, Workplace research",
author = "Jennifer Sappey",
note = "Imported on 12 May 2017 - DigiTool details were: publisher = Oxford: Chandos Publishing, 2009. editor/s (773b) = Keith Townsend and John Burgess; Issue no. (773s) = 11; Parent title (773t) = Method in the Madness?: Research stories you won't read in a textbook.",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781843344933",
pages = "135--145",
editor = "Keith Townsend and John Burgess",
booktitle = "Method in the Madness?",
publisher = "Chandos Publishing",
edition = "11",

}

Sappey, J 2009, A sporting chance: workplace ethnographies, ethics protocols and playing by the rules. in K Townsend & J Burgess (eds), Method in the Madness?: Research stories you won't read in a textbook. 11 edn, Chandos Publishing, Oxford, pp. 135-145.

A sporting chance : workplace ethnographies, ethics protocols and playing by the rules. / Sappey, Jennifer.

Method in the Madness?: Research stories you won't read in a textbook. ed. / Keith Townsend; John Burgess. 11. ed. Oxford : Chandos Publishing, 2009. p. 135-145.

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - A sporting chance

T2 - workplace ethnographies, ethics protocols and playing by the rules

AU - Sappey, Jennifer

N1 - Imported on 12 May 2017 - DigiTool details were: publisher = Oxford: Chandos Publishing, 2009. editor/s (773b) = Keith Townsend and John Burgess; Issue no. (773s) = 11; Parent title (773t) = Method in the Madness?: Research stories you won't read in a textbook.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - This is a researcher's story of her student adventures into workplace ethnography. First, is the tale of participant observation of the Queensland commercial fitness industry which in the early 1990s was one of the last 'award free' industries in Queensland. My club membership paid and my access secured, my conservative business suit discarded for spangled leotards and the latest pumps, I went to work. These were the days prior to restrictions on workplace ethnography introduced by the Australian national ethics protocols in 1999. I was free to follow leads as they appeared and to report my own observations as just another participant at the gym. Little could I have expected that my observations of the conditions of employment of one particular fitness centre would mushroom into a full-scale industry analysis, as employers took the extraordinary step of discarding self regulation and sought a formal industrial award. In May 1994 I sat alone in the public gallery of the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission, conspicuously the only witness to what, at face value, simply did not make sense: private-enterprise employers seeking to have government regulate their relationship with their workers. It seemed liked a researcher's manna from heaven.Second, is a contrasting tale of doctoral research into the changing nature of work for academics in Australian universities in 2000. Unlike the freedom of research design and procedures from my fitness industry study which chased down leads as they appeared, the newly introduced national research ethics protocols with their restrictions on access, design and procedures were compromising the integrity of the research and even threatening to curb the project outright. The challenge was just how to retrieve the research project and still play by the rules, even though the ethics regulations hardly seemed to offer a sporting chance to a workplace ethnographer.

AB - This is a researcher's story of her student adventures into workplace ethnography. First, is the tale of participant observation of the Queensland commercial fitness industry which in the early 1990s was one of the last 'award free' industries in Queensland. My club membership paid and my access secured, my conservative business suit discarded for spangled leotards and the latest pumps, I went to work. These were the days prior to restrictions on workplace ethnography introduced by the Australian national ethics protocols in 1999. I was free to follow leads as they appeared and to report my own observations as just another participant at the gym. Little could I have expected that my observations of the conditions of employment of one particular fitness centre would mushroom into a full-scale industry analysis, as employers took the extraordinary step of discarding self regulation and sought a formal industrial award. In May 1994 I sat alone in the public gallery of the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission, conspicuously the only witness to what, at face value, simply did not make sense: private-enterprise employers seeking to have government regulate their relationship with their workers. It seemed liked a researcher's manna from heaven.Second, is a contrasting tale of doctoral research into the changing nature of work for academics in Australian universities in 2000. Unlike the freedom of research design and procedures from my fitness industry study which chased down leads as they appeared, the newly introduced national research ethics protocols with their restrictions on access, design and procedures were compromising the integrity of the research and even threatening to curb the project outright. The challenge was just how to retrieve the research project and still play by the rules, even though the ethics regulations hardly seemed to offer a sporting chance to a workplace ethnographer.

KW - Open access version available

KW - Ethnography

KW - Methodology

KW - Research

KW - Workplace research

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781843344933

SP - 135

EP - 145

BT - Method in the Madness?

A2 - Townsend, Keith

A2 - Burgess, John

PB - Chandos Publishing

CY - Oxford

ER -

Sappey J. A sporting chance: workplace ethnographies, ethics protocols and playing by the rules. In Townsend K, Burgess J, editors, Method in the Madness?: Research stories you won't read in a textbook. 11 ed. Oxford: Chandos Publishing. 2009. p. 135-145