Abstract
Various theorists explain post-gay as synonymous with post-marriage equality and define it as an era where diverse sexual orientations are normalised within the mainstream; therefore, people with diverse sexual orientation experience less discrimination, marginalisation and prejudice. This chapter argues that while the post-gay offers a promise of utopia for gay and lesbian people and, by extension, the LGBTQIA+ communities, it exemplifies the proverbial wolf in sheep’s clothing. Drawing on a critical examination of newspaper articles on the same-sex marriage vote in Australia, this chapter evaluates Australia’s position in a post-gay world. The findings suggest discourse on the same-sex marriage vote focused predominantly on two key themes: (i) the need to protect those who did not accept same-sex marriage and relationships, and (ii) the role of government officials in weaponising the vote for political gain. The finding largely indicates that the post-gay invertedly favours the privileged by providing an illusion of inclusion and reducing the need for systemic and structural change within a conservative society. The chapter concludes by arguing that accepting the post-gay could result in inaction towards meaningfully achieving a more equitable society where sexual orientations are not politicised as a means of segregation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Gender, Feminist and Queer Studies |
Subtitle of host publication | Power, Privilege and Inequality in a Time of Neoliberal Conservatism |
Editors | Donna Bridges, Clifford Lewis, Elizabeth Wulff, Chelsea Litchfield, Larissa Bamberry |
Place of Publication | New York |
Publisher | Routledge |
Chapter | 14 |
Pages | 191-202 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Edition | 1st |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781003316954 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781032328294 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2024 |