Academic authors, scholarly publishing and open access in Australia

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

    • 13 Citations

    Abstract

    This paper briefly describes the rapidly changing research evaluation and funding landscape in Australian universities, specifically in relation to open access and institutional repositories. Recent announcements indicate that funding and evaluation bodies are becoming increasingly concerned that publicly funded research be made publicly available. The paper then reports a survey of all levels of academic staff plus research students at one Australian university, conducted in May 2006, prior to the introduction of an institutional repository. The survey, in line with previously reported surveys, found that while there was a high level of engagement with scholarly publishing, there was a low level of awareness of, or concern with, either open access ('green' or 'gold') or the roles repositories can play in increasing accessibility of research. Practically, this indicates that much work needs to be done within this university to increase knowledge of, and change behaviours with regard to, open access and repositories if the university and its academics are to make the most of new funding requirements and research evaluation processes.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages138-146
    Number of pages9
    JournalLearned Publishing
    Volume20
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2007

    Fingerprint

    open access
    university
    funding
    evaluation research
    gold
    staff
    evaluation
    student
    Gold
    Students

    Cite this

    @article{3809060f39984044a8e62a894d05d631,
    title = "Academic authors, scholarly publishing and open access in Australia",
    abstract = "This paper briefly describes the rapidly changing research evaluation and funding landscape in Australian universities, specifically in relation to open access and institutional repositories. Recent announcements indicate that funding and evaluation bodies are becoming increasingly concerned that publicly funded research be made publicly available. The paper then reports a survey of all levels of academic staff plus research students at one Australian university, conducted in May 2006, prior to the introduction of an institutional repository. The survey, in line with previously reported surveys, found that while there was a high level of engagement with scholarly publishing, there was a low level of awareness of, or concern with, either open access ('green' or 'gold') or the roles repositories can play in increasing accessibility of research. Practically, this indicates that much work needs to be done within this university to increase knowledge of, and change behaviours with regard to, open access and repositories if the university and its academics are to make the most of new funding requirements and research evaluation processes.",
    keywords = "Open access version available",
    author = "Kennan, {Mary Anne}",
    note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Learned Publishing. ISSNs: 0953-1513;",
    year = "2007",
    doi = "10.1087/174148507X185117",
    volume = "20",
    pages = "138--146",
    journal = "Learned Publishing",
    issn = "0953-1513",
    publisher = "Association of Learned and Professional Society Publ.",
    number = "2",

    }

    Academic authors, scholarly publishing and open access in Australia. / Kennan, Mary Anne.

    In: Learned Publishing, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2007, p. 138-146.

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Academic authors, scholarly publishing and open access in Australia

    AU - Kennan,Mary Anne

    N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Learned Publishing. ISSNs: 0953-1513;

    PY - 2007

    Y1 - 2007

    N2 - This paper briefly describes the rapidly changing research evaluation and funding landscape in Australian universities, specifically in relation to open access and institutional repositories. Recent announcements indicate that funding and evaluation bodies are becoming increasingly concerned that publicly funded research be made publicly available. The paper then reports a survey of all levels of academic staff plus research students at one Australian university, conducted in May 2006, prior to the introduction of an institutional repository. The survey, in line with previously reported surveys, found that while there was a high level of engagement with scholarly publishing, there was a low level of awareness of, or concern with, either open access ('green' or 'gold') or the roles repositories can play in increasing accessibility of research. Practically, this indicates that much work needs to be done within this university to increase knowledge of, and change behaviours with regard to, open access and repositories if the university and its academics are to make the most of new funding requirements and research evaluation processes.

    AB - This paper briefly describes the rapidly changing research evaluation and funding landscape in Australian universities, specifically in relation to open access and institutional repositories. Recent announcements indicate that funding and evaluation bodies are becoming increasingly concerned that publicly funded research be made publicly available. The paper then reports a survey of all levels of academic staff plus research students at one Australian university, conducted in May 2006, prior to the introduction of an institutional repository. The survey, in line with previously reported surveys, found that while there was a high level of engagement with scholarly publishing, there was a low level of awareness of, or concern with, either open access ('green' or 'gold') or the roles repositories can play in increasing accessibility of research. Practically, this indicates that much work needs to be done within this university to increase knowledge of, and change behaviours with regard to, open access and repositories if the university and its academics are to make the most of new funding requirements and research evaluation processes.

    KW - Open access version available

    U2 - 10.1087/174148507X185117

    DO - 10.1087/174148507X185117

    M3 - Article

    VL - 20

    SP - 138

    EP - 146

    JO - Learned Publishing

    T2 - Learned Publishing

    JF - Learned Publishing

    SN - 0953-1513

    IS - 2

    ER -