TY - JOUR
T1 - Accurate and efficient thermal stress analyses of functionally graded solids using incompatible graded finite elements
AU - Dhital, Sukirti
AU - Rokaya, Asmita
AU - Kaizer, Marina R.
AU - Zhang, Yu
AU - Kim, Jeongho
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019
PY - 2019/8/15
Y1 - 2019/8/15
N2 - Functionally graded materials have found a wide usage in high temperature applications. The smooth transition from one material to another, in graded materials, may reduce thermal stresses, residual stresses and stress concentration factors as well as utilize properties of both materials. To perform accurate and efficient finite element analysis for heat transfer and transient thermal stress analyses in two-dimensional functionally graded materials, incompatible graded finite elements are developed and verified. User-defined subroutines in ABAQUS are developed to address the gradation of material properties within an element. An emphasis is made on an incompatible six-node graded finite element (QM6)which is accurate and efficient compared to linear four-node (Q4)and quadratic eight-node (Q8)elements. With the help of posteriori error estimation, a critical comparison is made among three types of solid elements. Modified 6-node (QM6)incompatible graded elements provide better accuracy than Q4 elements and take less computational time than Q8 elements, thereby showing QM6 as an optimal element for engineering analysis.
AB - Functionally graded materials have found a wide usage in high temperature applications. The smooth transition from one material to another, in graded materials, may reduce thermal stresses, residual stresses and stress concentration factors as well as utilize properties of both materials. To perform accurate and efficient finite element analysis for heat transfer and transient thermal stress analyses in two-dimensional functionally graded materials, incompatible graded finite elements are developed and verified. User-defined subroutines in ABAQUS are developed to address the gradation of material properties within an element. An emphasis is made on an incompatible six-node graded finite element (QM6)which is accurate and efficient compared to linear four-node (Q4)and quadratic eight-node (Q8)elements. With the help of posteriori error estimation, a critical comparison is made among three types of solid elements. Modified 6-node (QM6)incompatible graded elements provide better accuracy than Q4 elements and take less computational time than Q8 elements, thereby showing QM6 as an optimal element for engineering analysis.
KW - Functionally graded material
KW - Grade finite elements
KW - Incompatible elements
KW - Quadrilateral elements
KW - Thermal stress
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064756260&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064756260&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110909
DO - 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110909
M3 - Article
C2 - 32189823
AN - SCOPUS:85064756260
SN - 1879-1085
VL - 222
JO - Composite Structures
JF - Composite Structures
M1 - 110909
ER -