Addressing the Curriculum Problem in Doctoral Education

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

How best to understand the curriculum problem in doctoral research education: that is the question that this paper engages. It begins by noting that curriculum as such is little referenced and inadequately theorised in higher education and certainly in doctoral education, and indeed has been described as a 'missing term'. The paper then reviews a now longstanding research programme in the latter field addressed specifically to research supervision, focusing on notions of pedagogy, textuality, subjectivity and knowledge. Over more than a decade and a half, a body of work has been produced in this regard, informed by literary and cultural studies, feminism and poststructuralist theory and philosophy, thereby opening up the field to new theoretical resources and perspectives. Following this, the paper goes on to draw more directly on contemporary curriculum thought and on what is called post-Reconceptualist curriculum inquiry to outline a curriculum-theoretical perspective on doctoral studies and research education, bringing together notions of representation, emergence, practice and futurity. It does so here with reference to both the PhD and the professional doctorate, but arguably has relevance for doctoral education more generally.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10-18
Number of pages9
JournalAustralian Universities' Review
Volume54
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2012

Fingerprint

curriculum
education
cultural studies
feminism
subjectivity
supervision
resources

Cite this

@article{4e3636438d4a452a9d410c196d433744,
title = "Addressing the Curriculum Problem in Doctoral Education",
abstract = "How best to understand the curriculum problem in doctoral research education: that is the question that this paper engages. It begins by noting that curriculum as such is little referenced and inadequately theorised in higher education and certainly in doctoral education, and indeed has been described as a 'missing term'. The paper then reviews a now longstanding research programme in the latter field addressed specifically to research supervision, focusing on notions of pedagogy, textuality, subjectivity and knowledge. Over more than a decade and a half, a body of work has been produced in this regard, informed by literary and cultural studies, feminism and poststructuralist theory and philosophy, thereby opening up the field to new theoretical resources and perspectives. Following this, the paper goes on to draw more directly on contemporary curriculum thought and on what is called post-Reconceptualist curriculum inquiry to outline a curriculum-theoretical perspective on doctoral studies and research education, bringing together notions of representation, emergence, practice and futurity. It does so here with reference to both the PhD and the professional doctorate, but arguably has relevance for doctoral education more generally.",
keywords = "Open access version available, Curriculum, research supervision, Doctoral research education, Post-Reconceptualist curriculum inquiry, Research programme",
author = "William Green",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = February, 2012; Journal title (773t) = Australian Universities' Review. ISSNs: 0818-8068;",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "10--18",
journal = "Australian Universities' Review",
issn = "0818-8068",
number = "1",

}

Addressing the Curriculum Problem in Doctoral Education. / Green, William.

In: Australian Universities' Review, Vol. 54, No. 1, 02.2012, p. 10-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Addressing the Curriculum Problem in Doctoral Education

AU - Green, William

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = February, 2012; Journal title (773t) = Australian Universities' Review. ISSNs: 0818-8068;

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - How best to understand the curriculum problem in doctoral research education: that is the question that this paper engages. It begins by noting that curriculum as such is little referenced and inadequately theorised in higher education and certainly in doctoral education, and indeed has been described as a 'missing term'. The paper then reviews a now longstanding research programme in the latter field addressed specifically to research supervision, focusing on notions of pedagogy, textuality, subjectivity and knowledge. Over more than a decade and a half, a body of work has been produced in this regard, informed by literary and cultural studies, feminism and poststructuralist theory and philosophy, thereby opening up the field to new theoretical resources and perspectives. Following this, the paper goes on to draw more directly on contemporary curriculum thought and on what is called post-Reconceptualist curriculum inquiry to outline a curriculum-theoretical perspective on doctoral studies and research education, bringing together notions of representation, emergence, practice and futurity. It does so here with reference to both the PhD and the professional doctorate, but arguably has relevance for doctoral education more generally.

AB - How best to understand the curriculum problem in doctoral research education: that is the question that this paper engages. It begins by noting that curriculum as such is little referenced and inadequately theorised in higher education and certainly in doctoral education, and indeed has been described as a 'missing term'. The paper then reviews a now longstanding research programme in the latter field addressed specifically to research supervision, focusing on notions of pedagogy, textuality, subjectivity and knowledge. Over more than a decade and a half, a body of work has been produced in this regard, informed by literary and cultural studies, feminism and poststructuralist theory and philosophy, thereby opening up the field to new theoretical resources and perspectives. Following this, the paper goes on to draw more directly on contemporary curriculum thought and on what is called post-Reconceptualist curriculum inquiry to outline a curriculum-theoretical perspective on doctoral studies and research education, bringing together notions of representation, emergence, practice and futurity. It does so here with reference to both the PhD and the professional doctorate, but arguably has relevance for doctoral education more generally.

KW - Open access version available

KW - Curriculum, research supervision

KW - Doctoral research education

KW - Post-Reconceptualist curriculum inquiry

KW - Research programme

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 10

EP - 18

JO - Australian Universities' Review

JF - Australian Universities' Review

SN - 0818-8068

IS - 1

ER -