Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Charles Sturt University Research Output Home
Home
Researchers
Research Organisations
Research Outputs
Datasets
Prizes
Activities
Press/Media
Impacts
Equipment
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Adversarial Forensic Science Experts: An empirical study of jury deliberation
Jane Delahunty, Kosuke Wakabayashi
Faculty Office, Business, Justice and Behavioural Sciences
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
4
Downloads (Pure)
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Adversarial Forensic Science Experts: An empirical study of jury deliberation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Rebuttal
100%
Science Experts
100%
Forensic Science
100%
Visual Aids
100%
White Coat Effect
100%
Jury Deliberation
100%
Expert Opinion
50%
Trace Analysis
50%
Expert Testimony
50%
Jury Decision-making
50%
Homicide
50%
Judicial Directions
50%
Forensic Expert
50%
Expert Witness
50%
Trace Evidence
50%
Procedural Safeguards
50%
Group Deliberation
50%
Cross-examination
50%
Interactive Visual
50%
Non-specific Binding
50%
Quantitative Outcome Measure
50%
Text Mining Techniques
50%
Difference of Opinion
50%
Arts and Humanities
Empirical study
100%
rebuttal
100%
Visual Aid
100%
Forensic Sciences
100%
Tradition
50%
Interactive
50%
verdict
50%
Procedural
50%
Decision-Making
50%
Expert Evidence
50%
Scientific Evidence
50%
Expert Witness
50%
Quotations
50%
Social Sciences
Legal Procedure
100%
Quotations
100%
Homicide
100%
Decision Making
100%
Psychology
Expert Witness
100%
Text Mining
100%
Decision Making
100%