Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Charles Sturt University Research Output Home
Home
Researchers
Research Organisations
Research Outputs
Datasets
Prizes
Activities
Press/Media
Impacts
Equipment
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Adversarial Forensic Science Experts: An empirical study of jury deliberation
Jane Delahunty, Kosuke Wakabayashi
Faculty Office, Business, Justice and Behavioural Sciences
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
4
Downloads (Pure)
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Adversarial Forensic Science Experts: An empirical study of jury deliberation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Social Sciences
Abstracts
11%
Analysis
11%
Binding
11%
Decision Making
11%
Deliberation
100%
Difference
11%
Evidence
44%
Examination
11%
Experts
100%
Group
11%
Homicide
11%
Intervention
11%
Juries
100%
Legal Procedure
11%
Mining
11%
Opinion
22%
Prominent
11%
Quantitative
11%
Quotations
11%
Science
100%
Witness
11%
Keyphrases
Cross-examination
50%
Group Deliberation
50%
Interactive Visual
50%
Non-specific Binding
50%
Procedural Safeguards
50%
Quantitative Outcome Measure
50%
Text Mining Techniques
50%
Trace Evidence
50%
Visual Aids
100%
White Coat Effect
100%
Psychology
Decision Making
100%
Expert Witness
100%
Group
100%
Text Mining
100%
Arts and Humanities
Expert Witness
12%
Forensic Sciences
100%
Forensics
12%
Mining
12%
Scientific Evidence
12%
Visual Aid
25%