An assessment for developing resilience capacity of Tasmanian coastal governance

Javad Jozaei, Michael Mitchell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Scholars argue that conventional environmental governance approaches have not been effective in reversing or slowing the deterioration of coupled social-ecological systems (SESs). Recent research suggests that resilience thinking offers a useful framework to analyse problems in SESs and could help improve the effectiveness of associated governance systems. Much of the available literature explores this from a theoretical perspective, identifying advantages from resilience thinking to improve governance of SESs. This paper builds on this literature, creating a set of attributes that are used to assess the specific challenges of a particular multi-level Tasmanian coastal governance context, and thus clarify where intervention responses are best directed. In this context, a low level of resilience capacity was apparent across the entire governance system. At the national level, we determined that knowledge management and sharing processes, and the diversity of expertise were the only attributes contributing to resilience capacity, with other attributes insufficiently developed to support any level of resilience. The performance was similarly poor at the Tasmanian state level, with leadership, adaptive planning, organisational flexibility and a supportive legislation framework at critically low capacity. Inter-organisational attributes also required significant improvement. On the other hand, a regional natural resource management body and two coastal local governments demonstrated attributes supportive of resilience capacity, including aspects related to leadership, transparent decision-making, stakeholder engagement, organisational learning, knowledge sharing and flexibility. These findings confirm that resilience thinking can offer practical suggestions for how to improve governance of this, particularly challenging context.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)130-140
Number of pages11
JournalOcean and Coastal Management
Volume163
Early online dateJun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Sep 2018

Fingerprint

governance
leadership
environmental governance
governance approach
social problems
local government
natural resource management
stakeholders
laws and regulations
decision making
resource management
stakeholder
natural resource
learning
planning
deterioration
attribute

Cite this

@article{9d07ac6829014f8e8ad5685c2e7fec8f,
title = "An assessment for developing resilience capacity of Tasmanian coastal governance",
abstract = "Scholars argue that conventional environmental governance approaches have not been effective in reversing or slowing the deterioration of coupled social-ecological systems (SESs). Recent research suggests that resilience thinking offers a useful framework to analyse problems in SESs and could help improve the effectiveness of associated governance systems. Much of the available literature explores this from a theoretical perspective, identifying advantages from resilience thinking to improve governance of SESs. This paper builds on this literature, creating a set of attributes that are used to assess the specific challenges of a particular multi-level Tasmanian coastal governance context, and thus clarify where intervention responses are best directed. In this context, a low level of resilience capacity was apparent across the entire governance system. At the national level, we determined that knowledge management and sharing processes, and the diversity of expertise were the only attributes contributing to resilience capacity, with other attributes insufficiently developed to support any level of resilience. The performance was similarly poor at the Tasmanian state level, with leadership, adaptive planning, organisational flexibility and a supportive legislation framework at critically low capacity. Inter-organisational attributes also required significant improvement. On the other hand, a regional natural resource management body and two coastal local governments demonstrated attributes supportive of resilience capacity, including aspects related to leadership, transparent decision-making, stakeholder engagement, organisational learning, knowledge sharing and flexibility. These findings confirm that resilience thinking can offer practical suggestions for how to improve governance of this, particularly challenging context.",
keywords = "Adaptability, Coastal governance, Panarchy, Resilience capacity, Resilience thinking, Social-ecological systems, Transformability",
author = "Javad Jozaei and Michael Mitchell",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.06.014",
language = "English",
volume = "163",
pages = "130--140",
journal = "Ocean and Coastal Management",
issn = "0964-5691",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

An assessment for developing resilience capacity of Tasmanian coastal governance. / Jozaei, Javad; Mitchell, Michael.

In: Ocean and Coastal Management, Vol. 163, 01.09.2018, p. 130-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An assessment for developing resilience capacity of Tasmanian coastal governance

AU - Jozaei, Javad

AU - Mitchell, Michael

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Scholars argue that conventional environmental governance approaches have not been effective in reversing or slowing the deterioration of coupled social-ecological systems (SESs). Recent research suggests that resilience thinking offers a useful framework to analyse problems in SESs and could help improve the effectiveness of associated governance systems. Much of the available literature explores this from a theoretical perspective, identifying advantages from resilience thinking to improve governance of SESs. This paper builds on this literature, creating a set of attributes that are used to assess the specific challenges of a particular multi-level Tasmanian coastal governance context, and thus clarify where intervention responses are best directed. In this context, a low level of resilience capacity was apparent across the entire governance system. At the national level, we determined that knowledge management and sharing processes, and the diversity of expertise were the only attributes contributing to resilience capacity, with other attributes insufficiently developed to support any level of resilience. The performance was similarly poor at the Tasmanian state level, with leadership, adaptive planning, organisational flexibility and a supportive legislation framework at critically low capacity. Inter-organisational attributes also required significant improvement. On the other hand, a regional natural resource management body and two coastal local governments demonstrated attributes supportive of resilience capacity, including aspects related to leadership, transparent decision-making, stakeholder engagement, organisational learning, knowledge sharing and flexibility. These findings confirm that resilience thinking can offer practical suggestions for how to improve governance of this, particularly challenging context.

AB - Scholars argue that conventional environmental governance approaches have not been effective in reversing or slowing the deterioration of coupled social-ecological systems (SESs). Recent research suggests that resilience thinking offers a useful framework to analyse problems in SESs and could help improve the effectiveness of associated governance systems. Much of the available literature explores this from a theoretical perspective, identifying advantages from resilience thinking to improve governance of SESs. This paper builds on this literature, creating a set of attributes that are used to assess the specific challenges of a particular multi-level Tasmanian coastal governance context, and thus clarify where intervention responses are best directed. In this context, a low level of resilience capacity was apparent across the entire governance system. At the national level, we determined that knowledge management and sharing processes, and the diversity of expertise were the only attributes contributing to resilience capacity, with other attributes insufficiently developed to support any level of resilience. The performance was similarly poor at the Tasmanian state level, with leadership, adaptive planning, organisational flexibility and a supportive legislation framework at critically low capacity. Inter-organisational attributes also required significant improvement. On the other hand, a regional natural resource management body and two coastal local governments demonstrated attributes supportive of resilience capacity, including aspects related to leadership, transparent decision-making, stakeholder engagement, organisational learning, knowledge sharing and flexibility. These findings confirm that resilience thinking can offer practical suggestions for how to improve governance of this, particularly challenging context.

KW - Adaptability

KW - Coastal governance

KW - Panarchy

KW - Resilience capacity

KW - Resilience thinking

KW - Social-ecological systems

KW - Transformability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048702415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048702415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.06.014

DO - 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.06.014

M3 - Article

VL - 163

SP - 130

EP - 140

JO - Ocean and Coastal Management

JF - Ocean and Coastal Management

SN - 0964-5691

ER -