An ethical and political argument for prioritizing the reduction of parasite-stress in the allocation of healthcare resources

Russell Powell, Stephen Clarke, Julian Savulescu

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The link between parasite-stress and complex psychological dispositions implies that the social, political, and economic benefits likely to flow from public health interventions that reduce rates of nonzoonotic infectious disease are far greater than have traditionally been thought. We sketch a prudential and ethical argument for increasing public health resources globally and redistributing these to focus on the alleviation of parasite-stress in human populations.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)90-91
    Number of pages2
    JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
    Volume35
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'An ethical and political argument for prioritizing the reduction of parasite-stress in the allocation of healthcare resources'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this