Appealing to the fundamental attribution error: Was it all a big mistake?

Stephen Clarke

Appealing to the fundamental attribution error: Was it all a big mistake?

Social Work and Arts

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paper › Chapter (peer-reviewed) › peer-review

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Conspiracy theories
Subtitle of host publication	The philosophical debate
Editors	David Coady
Place of Publication	Aldershot, UK
Publisher	Ashgate Publishing Limited
Pages	129-132
Number of pages	4
Edition	10
ISBN (Print)	0754652505
Publication status	Published - 2006

Cite this

@inbook{97f4e03c68914de6bbd4b7c3e337ec69,

title = "Appealing to the fundamental attribution error: Was it all a big mistake?",

author = "Stephen Clarke",

note = "Imported on 12 May 2017 - DigiTool details were: publisher = Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2006. editor/s (773b) = David Coady; Issue no. (773s) = 10; Parent title (773t) = Conspiracy theories: The philosophical debate.",

year = "2006",

language = "English",

isbn = "0754652505",

pages = "129--132",

editor = "David Coady",

booktitle = "Conspiracy theories",

publisher = "Ashgate Publishing Limited",

address = "United Kingdom",

edition = "10",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Appealing to the fundamental attribution error

T2 - Was it all a big mistake?

AU - Clarke, Stephen

N1 - Imported on 12 May 2017 - DigiTool details were: publisher = Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2006. editor/s (773b) = David Coady; Issue no. (773s) = 10; Parent title (773t) = Conspiracy theories: The philosophical debate.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 0754652505

SP - 129

EP - 132

BT - Conspiracy theories

A2 - Coady, David

PB - Ashgate Publishing Limited

CY - Aldershot, UK

ER -