TY - JOUR
T1 - Appraising the trustworthiness of qualitative studies
T2 - Guidelines for occupational therapists
AU - Curtin, Michael
AU - Fossey, Ellie
N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = June; Journal title (773t) = Australian Occupational Therapy Journal. ISSNs: 0045-0766;
PY - 2007/6
Y1 - 2007/6
N2 - Qualitative research provides a valuable source of evidence to enhance occupational therapy practice. Occupational therapists need to consider the issue of trustworthiness prior to deciding whether the findings of qualitative research have relevance to their day-to-day work. By trustworthiness we mean the extent to which the findings are an authentic reflection of the personal or lived experiences of the phenomenon under investigation. In this article we provide guidance to enable occupational therapists to competently determine the trustworthiness of a qualitative research project. We do this by explaining, and illustrating with examples, six considerations that should be taken into account when determining whether the method, findings and interpretation of a qualitative research have been conducted in a trustworthy manner. These considerations are evidence of thick description, triangulation strategies, member-checking, collaboration between the researcher and the researched, transferability and reflexivity. Once the trustworthiness of a qualitative research has been determined, occupational therapists are in a better position to consider how the research findings may impact on their practice.
AB - Qualitative research provides a valuable source of evidence to enhance occupational therapy practice. Occupational therapists need to consider the issue of trustworthiness prior to deciding whether the findings of qualitative research have relevance to their day-to-day work. By trustworthiness we mean the extent to which the findings are an authentic reflection of the personal or lived experiences of the phenomenon under investigation. In this article we provide guidance to enable occupational therapists to competently determine the trustworthiness of a qualitative research project. We do this by explaining, and illustrating with examples, six considerations that should be taken into account when determining whether the method, findings and interpretation of a qualitative research have been conducted in a trustworthy manner. These considerations are evidence of thick description, triangulation strategies, member-checking, collaboration between the researcher and the researched, transferability and reflexivity. Once the trustworthiness of a qualitative research has been determined, occupational therapists are in a better position to consider how the research findings may impact on their practice.
KW - Open access version available
KW - Qualitative research
KW - Trustworthiness
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=woscharlessturt_pure&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000254289600002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
U2 - 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00661.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00661.x
M3 - Article
SN - 0045-0766
VL - 54
SP - 88
EP - 94
JO - Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
JF - Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
IS - 2
ER -