Are we asking the right questions? Why we should have a decolonization discourse based on conscientisation rather than Indigenising the curriculum

Dawn Darlaston-Jones, Heather Herbert, Kelleigh Ryan, Whitney Darlaston-Jones, Jillene Harris, Pat Dudgeon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper, we pose the question of terminology and definitions associated with the concept of an indigenized academy or curriculum. Calls to indigenze the academy or curriculum are implicitly asking for an overlay or inclusion of Indigenous content, preferably by Indigenous peoples, as a mechanism to incorporate histories, traditions, and knowledges that are divergent to the dominant perspective(s). However, we question whether this approach is sufficient as there is no requirement on the part of the dominant group to question their role or position relative to that of Indigenous Australians. Consequently, we ask if it actually changes the norms to deconstruct racial, social, and cultural dominance in the context of colonized spaces. We further question whether such an approach has resulted in greater retention and graduation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students. As part of our argument, we offer a critical pedagogical approach of decolonization based on conscientization. This approach to education requires an awareness, acknowledgement, and shift on the part of the dominant group that a monocultural approach to education—irrespective of disciplinary orientation—is harmful to both the Indigenous and non-Indigenous community. It further offers the potential for education, and specifically psychology, to create a third space in which substantive reconciliation might occur.

Are We Asking the Right Questions? Why We Should Have a Decolonzing Discourse Based on Conscientization Rather Than Indigenizing the Curriculum (PDF Download Available). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275644957_Are_We_Asking_the_Right_Questions_Why_We_Should_Have_a_Decolonzing_Discourse_Based_on_Conscientization_Rather_Than_Indigenizing_the_Curriculum [accessed Sep 28, 2017].
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)86-104
Number of pages19
JournalCanadian Journal of Native Education
Volume37
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

decolonization
curriculum
discourse
academy
reconciliation
technical language
education
psychology
Group
inclusion
history
community
student

Grant Number

  • 100748

Cite this

Darlaston-Jones, Dawn ; Herbert, Heather ; Ryan, Kelleigh ; Darlaston-Jones, Whitney ; Harris, Jillene ; Dudgeon, Pat. / Are we asking the right questions? Why we should have a decolonization discourse based on conscientisation rather than Indigenising the curriculum. In: Canadian Journal of Native Education. 2014 ; Vol. 37, No. 1. pp. 86-104.
@article{3b1e6fd2e5614de385432403bd7faf52,
title = "Are we asking the right questions? Why we should have a decolonization discourse based on conscientisation rather than Indigenising the curriculum",
abstract = "In this paper, we pose the question of terminology and definitions associated with the concept of an indigenized academy or curriculum. Calls to indigenze the academy or curriculum are implicitly asking for an overlay or inclusion of Indigenous content, preferably by Indigenous peoples, as a mechanism to incorporate histories, traditions, and knowledges that are divergent to the dominant perspective(s). However, we question whether this approach is sufficient as there is no requirement on the part of the dominant group to question their role or position relative to that of Indigenous Australians. Consequently, we ask if it actually changes the norms to deconstruct racial, social, and cultural dominance in the context of colonized spaces. We further question whether such an approach has resulted in greater retention and graduation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students. As part of our argument, we offer a critical pedagogical approach of decolonization based on conscientization. This approach to education requires an awareness, acknowledgement, and shift on the part of the dominant group that a monocultural approach to education—irrespective of disciplinary orientation—is harmful to both the Indigenous and non-Indigenous community. It further offers the potential for education, and specifically psychology, to create a third space in which substantive reconciliation might occur. Are We Asking the Right Questions? Why We Should Have a Decolonzing Discourse Based on Conscientization Rather Than Indigenizing the Curriculum (PDF Download Available). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275644957_Are_We_Asking_the_Right_Questions_Why_We_Should_Have_a_Decolonzing_Discourse_Based_on_Conscientization_Rather_Than_Indigenizing_the_Curriculum [accessed Sep 28, 2017].",
author = "Dawn Darlaston-Jones and Heather Herbert and Kelleigh Ryan and Whitney Darlaston-Jones and Jillene Harris and Pat Dudgeon",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "86--104",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Native Education",
issn = "0318-8647",
number = "1",

}

Are we asking the right questions? Why we should have a decolonization discourse based on conscientisation rather than Indigenising the curriculum. / Darlaston-Jones, Dawn; Herbert, Heather; Ryan, Kelleigh; Darlaston-Jones, Whitney; Harris, Jillene; Dudgeon, Pat.

In: Canadian Journal of Native Education, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2014, p. 86-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are we asking the right questions? Why we should have a decolonization discourse based on conscientisation rather than Indigenising the curriculum

AU - Darlaston-Jones, Dawn

AU - Herbert, Heather

AU - Ryan, Kelleigh

AU - Darlaston-Jones, Whitney

AU - Harris, Jillene

AU - Dudgeon, Pat

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - In this paper, we pose the question of terminology and definitions associated with the concept of an indigenized academy or curriculum. Calls to indigenze the academy or curriculum are implicitly asking for an overlay or inclusion of Indigenous content, preferably by Indigenous peoples, as a mechanism to incorporate histories, traditions, and knowledges that are divergent to the dominant perspective(s). However, we question whether this approach is sufficient as there is no requirement on the part of the dominant group to question their role or position relative to that of Indigenous Australians. Consequently, we ask if it actually changes the norms to deconstruct racial, social, and cultural dominance in the context of colonized spaces. We further question whether such an approach has resulted in greater retention and graduation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students. As part of our argument, we offer a critical pedagogical approach of decolonization based on conscientization. This approach to education requires an awareness, acknowledgement, and shift on the part of the dominant group that a monocultural approach to education—irrespective of disciplinary orientation—is harmful to both the Indigenous and non-Indigenous community. It further offers the potential for education, and specifically psychology, to create a third space in which substantive reconciliation might occur. Are We Asking the Right Questions? Why We Should Have a Decolonzing Discourse Based on Conscientization Rather Than Indigenizing the Curriculum (PDF Download Available). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275644957_Are_We_Asking_the_Right_Questions_Why_We_Should_Have_a_Decolonzing_Discourse_Based_on_Conscientization_Rather_Than_Indigenizing_the_Curriculum [accessed Sep 28, 2017].

AB - In this paper, we pose the question of terminology and definitions associated with the concept of an indigenized academy or curriculum. Calls to indigenze the academy or curriculum are implicitly asking for an overlay or inclusion of Indigenous content, preferably by Indigenous peoples, as a mechanism to incorporate histories, traditions, and knowledges that are divergent to the dominant perspective(s). However, we question whether this approach is sufficient as there is no requirement on the part of the dominant group to question their role or position relative to that of Indigenous Australians. Consequently, we ask if it actually changes the norms to deconstruct racial, social, and cultural dominance in the context of colonized spaces. We further question whether such an approach has resulted in greater retention and graduation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students. As part of our argument, we offer a critical pedagogical approach of decolonization based on conscientization. This approach to education requires an awareness, acknowledgement, and shift on the part of the dominant group that a monocultural approach to education—irrespective of disciplinary orientation—is harmful to both the Indigenous and non-Indigenous community. It further offers the potential for education, and specifically psychology, to create a third space in which substantive reconciliation might occur. Are We Asking the Right Questions? Why We Should Have a Decolonzing Discourse Based on Conscientization Rather Than Indigenizing the Curriculum (PDF Download Available). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275644957_Are_We_Asking_the_Right_Questions_Why_We_Should_Have_a_Decolonzing_Discourse_Based_on_Conscientization_Rather_Than_Indigenizing_the_Curriculum [accessed Sep 28, 2017].

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 86

EP - 104

JO - Canadian Journal of Native Education

JF - Canadian Journal of Native Education

SN - 0318-8647

IS - 1

ER -