Assessing unfair prejudice from extremist images in terrorism trials

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperChapter (peer-reviewed)

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Terrorism has become an everyday reality in most contemporary societies. In a context of heightened fear can juries be trusted to remain impartial when confronted by defendants charged with terrorism? Do they scrutinize prosecution cases carefully, or does emotion trump reason once the spectre of terrorism is invoked? This book examines these questions from a range of disciplinary perspectives. The authors look at the how jurors in terrorism trials are likely to respond to gruesome evidence, including beheading videos. The 'CSI effect' is examined as a possible response to forensic evidence, and jurors with different learning preferences are compared. Virtual interactive environments, built like computer games, may be created to provide animated reconstructions of the prosecution or defence case. This book reports on how to create such presentations, culminating in the analysis of a live simulated trial using interactive visual displays followed by jury deliberations. The team of international, transdisciplinary experts draw conclusions of global legal and political significance, and contribute to the growing scholarship on comparative counter-terrorism law. The book will be of great interest to scholars, students and practitioners of law, criminal justice, forensic science and psychology.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationJuries, science and popular culture in the age of terror
Subtitle of host publicationThe case of the Sydney bomber
EditorsDaivd Tait, Jane Goodman-Delahunty
Place of PublicationUnited Kingdom
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Chapter6
Pages87-122
Number of pages36
ISBN (Electronic)9781137554758
ISBN (Print)9781137554741
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

prejudice
terrorism
prosecution
transdisciplinary
criminal law
computer game
deliberation
evidence
reconstruction
emotion
psychology
video
justice
expert
anxiety
Law
science
society
learning
student

Cite this

Delahunty, J. (2017). Assessing unfair prejudice from extremist images in terrorism trials. In D. Tait, & J. Goodman-Delahunty (Eds.), Juries, science and popular culture in the age of terror: The case of the Sydney bomber (pp. 87-122). United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55475-8_6
Delahunty, Jane. / Assessing unfair prejudice from extremist images in terrorism trials. Juries, science and popular culture in the age of terror: The case of the Sydney bomber. editor / Daivd Tait ; Jane Goodman-Delahunty. United Kingdom : Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. pp. 87-122
@inbook{7fd1dc4d4436482ab67c7f7827bdaba5,
title = "Assessing unfair prejudice from extremist images in terrorism trials",
abstract = "Terrorism has become an everyday reality in most contemporary societies. In a context of heightened fear can juries be trusted to remain impartial when confronted by defendants charged with terrorism? Do they scrutinize prosecution cases carefully, or does emotion trump reason once the spectre of terrorism is invoked? This book examines these questions from a range of disciplinary perspectives. The authors look at the how jurors in terrorism trials are likely to respond to gruesome evidence, including beheading videos. The 'CSI effect' is examined as a possible response to forensic evidence, and jurors with different learning preferences are compared. Virtual interactive environments, built like computer games, may be created to provide animated reconstructions of the prosecution or defence case. This book reports on how to create such presentations, culminating in the analysis of a live simulated trial using interactive visual displays followed by jury deliberations. The team of international, transdisciplinary experts draw conclusions of global legal and political significance, and contribute to the growing scholarship on comparative counter-terrorism law. The book will be of great interest to scholars, students and practitioners of law, criminal justice, forensic science and psychology.",
keywords = "Terrorist Attack, World trade center, International affective picture system, Mock Juror, Mortality salience",
author = "Jane Delahunty",
note = "Includes bibliographical references.",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1057/978-1-137-55475-8_6",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781137554741",
pages = "87--122",
editor = "Daivd Tait and Goodman-Delahunty, {Jane }",
booktitle = "Juries, science and popular culture in the age of terror",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Delahunty, J 2017, Assessing unfair prejudice from extremist images in terrorism trials. in D Tait & J Goodman-Delahunty (eds), Juries, science and popular culture in the age of terror: The case of the Sydney bomber. Palgrave Macmillan, United Kingdom, pp. 87-122. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55475-8_6

Assessing unfair prejudice from extremist images in terrorism trials. / Delahunty, Jane.

Juries, science and popular culture in the age of terror: The case of the Sydney bomber. ed. / Daivd Tait; Jane Goodman-Delahunty. United Kingdom : Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. p. 87-122.

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperChapter (peer-reviewed)

TY - CHAP

T1 - Assessing unfair prejudice from extremist images in terrorism trials

AU - Delahunty, Jane

N1 - Includes bibliographical references.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Terrorism has become an everyday reality in most contemporary societies. In a context of heightened fear can juries be trusted to remain impartial when confronted by defendants charged with terrorism? Do they scrutinize prosecution cases carefully, or does emotion trump reason once the spectre of terrorism is invoked? This book examines these questions from a range of disciplinary perspectives. The authors look at the how jurors in terrorism trials are likely to respond to gruesome evidence, including beheading videos. The 'CSI effect' is examined as a possible response to forensic evidence, and jurors with different learning preferences are compared. Virtual interactive environments, built like computer games, may be created to provide animated reconstructions of the prosecution or defence case. This book reports on how to create such presentations, culminating in the analysis of a live simulated trial using interactive visual displays followed by jury deliberations. The team of international, transdisciplinary experts draw conclusions of global legal and political significance, and contribute to the growing scholarship on comparative counter-terrorism law. The book will be of great interest to scholars, students and practitioners of law, criminal justice, forensic science and psychology.

AB - Terrorism has become an everyday reality in most contemporary societies. In a context of heightened fear can juries be trusted to remain impartial when confronted by defendants charged with terrorism? Do they scrutinize prosecution cases carefully, or does emotion trump reason once the spectre of terrorism is invoked? This book examines these questions from a range of disciplinary perspectives. The authors look at the how jurors in terrorism trials are likely to respond to gruesome evidence, including beheading videos. The 'CSI effect' is examined as a possible response to forensic evidence, and jurors with different learning preferences are compared. Virtual interactive environments, built like computer games, may be created to provide animated reconstructions of the prosecution or defence case. This book reports on how to create such presentations, culminating in the analysis of a live simulated trial using interactive visual displays followed by jury deliberations. The team of international, transdisciplinary experts draw conclusions of global legal and political significance, and contribute to the growing scholarship on comparative counter-terrorism law. The book will be of great interest to scholars, students and practitioners of law, criminal justice, forensic science and psychology.

KW - Terrorist Attack

KW - World trade center

KW - International affective picture system

KW - Mock Juror

KW - Mortality salience

U2 - 10.1057/978-1-137-55475-8_6

DO - 10.1057/978-1-137-55475-8_6

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 9781137554741

SP - 87

EP - 122

BT - Juries, science and popular culture in the age of terror

A2 - Tait, Daivd

A2 - Goodman-Delahunty, Jane

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

CY - United Kingdom

ER -

Delahunty J. Assessing unfair prejudice from extremist images in terrorism trials. In Tait D, Goodman-Delahunty J, editors, Juries, science and popular culture in the age of terror: The case of the Sydney bomber. United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan. 2017. p. 87-122 https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55475-8_6