TY - JOUR
T1 - At the heart of sentencing
T2 - Exploring whether more compassionate delivery of sentencing remarks increases public concern for people who offend
AU - Hopkins, Anthony
AU - Dodd, Shannon
AU - Nolan, Mark
AU - Bartels, Lorana
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Compassion has the capacity to change how we think and feel about people who offend, enabling us to understand individual and systemic causes of criminality and whether, and in what circumstances, desistance is possible. Across two experiments, our research examined whether a more compassionate sentencing delivery, firstly, in written sentencing remarks and, secondly, in videoed sentencing remarks, stimulated more concern for sentenced offenders amongst members of the Australian public. Our results suggest that it is possible to alter the features of a written or orally-delivered sentence, so that it is recognisably more compassionate. Further, engagement with compassion-enhanced sentencing remarks altered criminal justice spending preferences, reducing the proportion of the criminal justice budget that the public believed should be spent on imprisonment and increasing that to be spent on rehabilitation.
AB - Compassion has the capacity to change how we think and feel about people who offend, enabling us to understand individual and systemic causes of criminality and whether, and in what circumstances, desistance is possible. Across two experiments, our research examined whether a more compassionate sentencing delivery, firstly, in written sentencing remarks and, secondly, in videoed sentencing remarks, stimulated more concern for sentenced offenders amongst members of the Australian public. Our results suggest that it is possible to alter the features of a written or orally-delivered sentence, so that it is recognisably more compassionate. Further, engagement with compassion-enhanced sentencing remarks altered criminal justice spending preferences, reducing the proportion of the criminal justice budget that the public believed should be spent on imprisonment and increasing that to be spent on rehabilitation.
KW - compassion, therapeutic jurisprudence, sentencing, crime, punitiveness, public policy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132661149&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85132661149&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13218719.2022.2040398
DO - 10.1080/13218719.2022.2040398
M3 - Article
C2 - 37484513
SN - 1321-8719
VL - 30
SP - 459
EP - 485
JO - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
JF - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
IS - 4
ER -