Australia's developmental trajectory: Neoliberal or not?

Vaughan Higgins

doi:10.1177/2043820614536501

Australia's developmental trajectory: Neoliberal or not?

Vaughan Higgins

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

7 Citations (Scopus)

16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

General support is given for Weller and O'Neill's (2014) aim to question the influence of neoliberalism on political and economic change in Australia. However, their key proposition that Australia's developmental trajectory has never been neoliberal in intent or outcome is challenged. Critiqued also is Weller and O'Neill's use of a working definition of neoliberalism that fails to engage explicitly or sufficiently with theoretical perspectives on neoliberal governance. A governmentality approach is argued to offer a way forward in exploring how neoliberal and non-neoliberal rationalities and techniques articulate with one another as part of attempts to address specific problematizations of rule.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	161-164
Number of pages	4
Journal	Dialogues in Human Geography
Volume	4
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820614536501
Publication status	Published - 2014

Fingerprint

neoliberalism

trajectory

governmentality

political change

economic change

rationality

governance

economics

Cite this

Higgins, V. (2014). Australia's developmental trajectory: Neoliberal or not? Dialogues in Human Geography, 4(2), 161-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820614536501

Higgins, Vaughan. / Australia's developmental trajectory : Neoliberal or not?. In: Dialogues in Human Geography. 2014 ; Vol. 4, No. 2. pp. 161-164.

@article{78d32f81ec1e4f02808d4b7b9d7ffa92,

title = "Australia's developmental trajectory: Neoliberal or not?",

abstract = "General support is given for Weller and O'Neill's (2014) aim to question the influence of neoliberalism on political and economic change in Australia. However, their key proposition that Australia's developmental trajectory has never been neoliberal in intent or outcome is challenged. Critiqued also is Weller and O'Neill's use of a working definition of neoliberalism that fails to engage explicitly or sufficiently with theoretical perspectives on neoliberal governance. A governmentality approach is argued to offer a way forward in exploring how neoliberal and non-neoliberal rationalities and techniques articulate with one another as part of attempts to address specific problematizations of rule.",

keywords = "Australia, Governmentality, Hybrid governance, Neoliberalism",

author = "Vaughan Higgins",

note = "Includes bibliographical references.",

year = "2014",

doi = "10.1177/2043820614536501",

language = "English",

volume = "4",

pages = "161--164",

journal = "Dialogues in Human Geography",

issn = "2043-8206",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "2",

}

Higgins, V 2014, 'Australia's developmental trajectory: Neoliberal or not?', Dialogues in Human Geography, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 161-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820614536501

Australia's developmental trajectory : Neoliberal or not? / Higgins, Vaughan.

In: Dialogues in Human Geography, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2014, p. 161-164.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Australia's developmental trajectory

T2 - Neoliberal or not?

AU - Higgins, Vaughan

N1 - Includes bibliographical references.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - General support is given for Weller and O'Neill's (2014) aim to question the influence of neoliberalism on political and economic change in Australia. However, their key proposition that Australia's developmental trajectory has never been neoliberal in intent or outcome is challenged. Critiqued also is Weller and O'Neill's use of a working definition of neoliberalism that fails to engage explicitly or sufficiently with theoretical perspectives on neoliberal governance. A governmentality approach is argued to offer a way forward in exploring how neoliberal and non-neoliberal rationalities and techniques articulate with one another as part of attempts to address specific problematizations of rule.

AB - General support is given for Weller and O'Neill's (2014) aim to question the influence of neoliberalism on political and economic change in Australia. However, their key proposition that Australia's developmental trajectory has never been neoliberal in intent or outcome is challenged. Critiqued also is Weller and O'Neill's use of a working definition of neoliberalism that fails to engage explicitly or sufficiently with theoretical perspectives on neoliberal governance. A governmentality approach is argued to offer a way forward in exploring how neoliberal and non-neoliberal rationalities and techniques articulate with one another as part of attempts to address specific problematizations of rule.

KW - Australia

KW - Governmentality

KW - Hybrid governance

KW - Neoliberalism

U2 - 10.1177/2043820614536501

DO - 10.1177/2043820614536501

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 161

EP - 164

JO - Dialogues in Human Geography

JF - Dialogues in Human Geography