TY - JOUR
T1 - Barriers and Enablers of Primary Healthcare Professionals in Health Research Engagement
T2 - A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies
AU - Matheson, Mark
AU - Skinner, Ian W
AU - Vehagen, Arianne
AU - Auliffe, Sean Mc
AU - Malliaras, Peter
N1 - © 2025 The Author(s). Nursing & Health Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - Health professional engagement ensures relevant, clinically focused research that informs evidence-based care. Research shows health professionals may not engage optimally in research. Understanding barriers and enablers influencing participation is necessary to enhance engagement. This systematic review explores these factors among primary healthcare professionals. We searched peer-reviewed studies using CINAHL, Medline, and SCOPUS in February 2023, updated in June 2024. The review followed PRISMA and the ENTREQ checklist. Studies included those published in English, reporting factors influencing engagement among primary healthcare professionals. Qualitative data were extracted and thematically synthesized. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. Nineteen studies were included. Enablers include individual positive attitudes and a scholarly environment. Barriers include negative attitudes, an unconducive environment, and system constraints. Primary health professionals view research engagement positively, recognizing its potential to enhance health outcomes, professional growth, and business performance. Balancing clinical responsibilities, workload and research is challenging. Targeted strategies promoting partnerships and stakeholder involvement can foster a scholarly environment and empower research engagement.
AB - Health professional engagement ensures relevant, clinically focused research that informs evidence-based care. Research shows health professionals may not engage optimally in research. Understanding barriers and enablers influencing participation is necessary to enhance engagement. This systematic review explores these factors among primary healthcare professionals. We searched peer-reviewed studies using CINAHL, Medline, and SCOPUS in February 2023, updated in June 2024. The review followed PRISMA and the ENTREQ checklist. Studies included those published in English, reporting factors influencing engagement among primary healthcare professionals. Qualitative data were extracted and thematically synthesized. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. Nineteen studies were included. Enablers include individual positive attitudes and a scholarly environment. Barriers include negative attitudes, an unconducive environment, and system constraints. Primary health professionals view research engagement positively, recognizing its potential to enhance health outcomes, professional growth, and business performance. Balancing clinical responsibilities, workload and research is challenging. Targeted strategies promoting partnerships and stakeholder involvement can foster a scholarly environment and empower research engagement.
KW - Humans
KW - Qualitative Research
KW - Health Personnel/psychology
KW - Primary Health Care/standards
KW - Work Engagement
KW - Attitude of Health Personnel
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85214373765&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85214373765&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/nhs.70022
DO - 10.1111/nhs.70022
M3 - Review article
C2 - 39789896
SN - 1441-0745
VL - 27
SP - e70022
JO - Nursing and Health Sciences
JF - Nursing and Health Sciences
IS - 1
M1 - e70022
ER -