TY - JOUR
T1 - Beyond phoresy
T2 - symbioses between dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) and mites (Acari)
AU - Noriega, Jorge Ari
AU - Halliday, Bruce
AU - Weston, Paul
AU - Thotagamuwa, Aga
AU - Gurr, Geoff
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 70176 Stuttgart, Germany.
PY - 2022/7/11
Y1 - 2022/7/11
N2 - Decomposers are an essential component in any ecosystem and excrement represents one of the most abundant resources. Dung beetles and mites are important taxa in this microhabitat and interact in complex ways. Usually, a phoretic association is assumed, with mites merely being transported by beetles, but the extent of this relationship is poorly under-stood. We performed a comprehensive literature search and identified 245 relevant articles from which we recognised three major forms of symbiosis: i) commensalism, constituting phoresy with no cost to the host, ii) parasitism, in which preda-tion, competition, or antagonism feature to the detriment of one partner, and iii) mutualism, in which both beetle and mite derive benefit. We examine the evidence for commensal phoresy, negative effects (parasitism, predation, or competition), and mutualism. Further, we identify as research priorities the exploration of ecological succession and seasonal dynamics, the effect of introduced mite species on ecosystem services, and co-evolution. In conclusion, the association and potential success of a hypothetical “phoresy” between mites and dung beetles depend on several variables that need to be evaluated. Finally, there is a lack of empirical data regarding dung beetle-mite interactions, with a large knowledge gap in several aspects, mainly because phoresy remains understudied.
AB - Decomposers are an essential component in any ecosystem and excrement represents one of the most abundant resources. Dung beetles and mites are important taxa in this microhabitat and interact in complex ways. Usually, a phoretic association is assumed, with mites merely being transported by beetles, but the extent of this relationship is poorly under-stood. We performed a comprehensive literature search and identified 245 relevant articles from which we recognised three major forms of symbiosis: i) commensalism, constituting phoresy with no cost to the host, ii) parasitism, in which preda-tion, competition, or antagonism feature to the detriment of one partner, and iii) mutualism, in which both beetle and mite derive benefit. We examine the evidence for commensal phoresy, negative effects (parasitism, predation, or competition), and mutualism. Further, we identify as research priorities the exploration of ecological succession and seasonal dynamics, the effect of introduced mite species on ecosystem services, and co-evolution. In conclusion, the association and potential success of a hypothetical “phoresy” between mites and dung beetles depend on several variables that need to be evaluated. Finally, there is a lack of empirical data regarding dung beetle-mite interactions, with a large knowledge gap in several aspects, mainly because phoresy remains understudied.
KW - Acari
KW - biological interactions
KW - commensalism
KW - decomposition networks
KW - Mesostigmata
KW - parasitism
KW - Scarabaeidae
KW - species specificity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134716460&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85134716460&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1127/entomologia/2021/1406
DO - 10.1127/entomologia/2021/1406
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85134716460
SN - 2363-7102
VL - 42
SP - 499
EP - 513
JO - Entomologia Generalis
JF - Entomologia Generalis
IS - 4
ER -