Beyond the fringe?

Market desirability and alternative sexuality in advertising news

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperChapter (peer-reviewed)

Abstract

This chapter contributes a sociological qualitative content analysis (QCA) of discourse in all advertising news articles (henceforth “advertising articles”) published between September 2014 and September 2015 in The New York Times (henceforth, TNYTimes). The interpretive analysis examines social meanings created in conjunction with bisexual, gay, intersex, lesbian, queer, transsexual, or transgender keyword appearance. The research question is, How do TNYTimes’ advertising news articles present non-heterosexuality? Critical feminism, social inequality, and critical discourse analysis (CDA) literatures inform exploration of imagery, ideas, and knowledge produced about nonheterosexuality. Much literature discusses identity politics and intersectionality (Jones, Misra, and McCurley 2013). Although this chapter contributes to intersectionality literature by highlighting the complexity and limitations of representing gender/sexuality as isolated, reified social constructs, I adopt “nonheterosexuality” as the imperfect term to represent all sexuality/gender expression other than traditional heterosexuality. Readers may consult the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association’s reference guide http://www.nlgja.org/stylebook/ for detailed definitions.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationFeminist Perspectives on Advertising
Subtitle of host publicationWhat's the big idea?
EditorsKim Golombisky
Place of PublicationUnited States
PublisherLexington Books
Chapter12
Pages257-284
Number of pages28
ISBN (Electronic)9781498528337
ISBN (Print)9781498528320
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

sexuality
intersectionality
news
journalists' association
market
heterosexuality
gender
social inequality
feminism
discourse analysis
content analysis
politics
discourse
present
literature

Cite this

Ragusa, A. (2019). Beyond the fringe? Market desirability and alternative sexuality in advertising news. In K. Golombisky (Ed.), Feminist Perspectives on Advertising: What's the big idea? (pp. 257-284). United States: Lexington Books.
Ragusa, Angela. / Beyond the fringe? Market desirability and alternative sexuality in advertising news. Feminist Perspectives on Advertising: What's the big idea?. editor / Kim Golombisky. United States : Lexington Books, 2019. pp. 257-284
@inbook{a8739acba0b74a5680588507b5ac700a,
title = "Beyond the fringe?: Market desirability and alternative sexuality in advertising news",
abstract = "This chapter contributes a sociological qualitative content analysis (QCA) of discourse in all advertising news articles (henceforth “advertising articles”) published between September 2014 and September 2015 in The New York Times (henceforth, TNYTimes). The interpretive analysis examines social meanings created in conjunction with bisexual, gay, intersex, lesbian, queer, transsexual, or transgender keyword appearance. The research question is, How do TNYTimes’ advertising news articles present non-heterosexuality? Critical feminism, social inequality, and critical discourse analysis (CDA) literatures inform exploration of imagery, ideas, and knowledge produced about nonheterosexuality. Much literature discusses identity politics and intersectionality (Jones, Misra, and McCurley 2013). Although this chapter contributes to intersectionality literature by highlighting the complexity and limitations of representing gender/sexuality as isolated, reified social constructs, I adopt “nonheterosexuality” as the imperfect term to represent all sexuality/gender expression other than traditional heterosexuality. Readers may consult the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association’s reference guide http://www.nlgja.org/stylebook/ for detailed definitions.",
author = "Angela Ragusa",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781498528320",
pages = "257--284",
editor = "Kim Golombisky",
booktitle = "Feminist Perspectives on Advertising",
publisher = "Lexington Books",

}

Ragusa, A 2019, Beyond the fringe? Market desirability and alternative sexuality in advertising news. in K Golombisky (ed.), Feminist Perspectives on Advertising: What's the big idea?. Lexington Books, United States, pp. 257-284.

Beyond the fringe? Market desirability and alternative sexuality in advertising news. / Ragusa, Angela.

Feminist Perspectives on Advertising: What's the big idea?. ed. / Kim Golombisky. United States : Lexington Books, 2019. p. 257-284.

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperChapter (peer-reviewed)

TY - CHAP

T1 - Beyond the fringe?

T2 - Market desirability and alternative sexuality in advertising news

AU - Ragusa, Angela

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This chapter contributes a sociological qualitative content analysis (QCA) of discourse in all advertising news articles (henceforth “advertising articles”) published between September 2014 and September 2015 in The New York Times (henceforth, TNYTimes). The interpretive analysis examines social meanings created in conjunction with bisexual, gay, intersex, lesbian, queer, transsexual, or transgender keyword appearance. The research question is, How do TNYTimes’ advertising news articles present non-heterosexuality? Critical feminism, social inequality, and critical discourse analysis (CDA) literatures inform exploration of imagery, ideas, and knowledge produced about nonheterosexuality. Much literature discusses identity politics and intersectionality (Jones, Misra, and McCurley 2013). Although this chapter contributes to intersectionality literature by highlighting the complexity and limitations of representing gender/sexuality as isolated, reified social constructs, I adopt “nonheterosexuality” as the imperfect term to represent all sexuality/gender expression other than traditional heterosexuality. Readers may consult the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association’s reference guide http://www.nlgja.org/stylebook/ for detailed definitions.

AB - This chapter contributes a sociological qualitative content analysis (QCA) of discourse in all advertising news articles (henceforth “advertising articles”) published between September 2014 and September 2015 in The New York Times (henceforth, TNYTimes). The interpretive analysis examines social meanings created in conjunction with bisexual, gay, intersex, lesbian, queer, transsexual, or transgender keyword appearance. The research question is, How do TNYTimes’ advertising news articles present non-heterosexuality? Critical feminism, social inequality, and critical discourse analysis (CDA) literatures inform exploration of imagery, ideas, and knowledge produced about nonheterosexuality. Much literature discusses identity politics and intersectionality (Jones, Misra, and McCurley 2013). Although this chapter contributes to intersectionality literature by highlighting the complexity and limitations of representing gender/sexuality as isolated, reified social constructs, I adopt “nonheterosexuality” as the imperfect term to represent all sexuality/gender expression other than traditional heterosexuality. Readers may consult the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association’s reference guide http://www.nlgja.org/stylebook/ for detailed definitions.

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 9781498528320

SP - 257

EP - 284

BT - Feminist Perspectives on Advertising

A2 - Golombisky, Kim

PB - Lexington Books

CY - United States

ER -

Ragusa A. Beyond the fringe? Market desirability and alternative sexuality in advertising news. In Golombisky K, editor, Feminist Perspectives on Advertising: What's the big idea?. United States: Lexington Books. 2019. p. 257-284