TY - JOUR
T1 - Biodiversity on private land
T2 - Lessons from the Mid-Murray Valley in South-eastern Australia
AU - Ward, Wesley W.
AU - Bond, Jennifer
AU - Burge, Louise
AU - Conallin, John
AU - Finlayson, Colin (Max)
AU - Michael, Damian
AU - Scoullar, Shelley
AU - Vanderzee, Michael
AU - Wettenhall, Adam
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Ecological Management & Restoration published by Ecological Society of Australia and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
The project arose from concerns in the NSW Mid-Murray region regarding declining input from the local community into NRM research and management in their region.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - In this article, we use an autoethnographic approach to explore relationships between landholders and government agencies and natural resource management projects. We use this exploration to argue for a holistic, collaborative approach to decision making around the implementation of biodiversity conservation on private and public land. This approach aligns with principles underpinning reconciliation ecology, which emphasises the inclusion of grass-roots communities for promoting biodiversity conservation in human-dominated landscapes where approaches to the management of natural resources may be contested. We present three projects (Environmental Champions; Fencing Incentive programmes; Plains-wanderer programme) and other research from the Mid-Murray Valley region of southern New South Wales to highlight the positive and negative aspects of relationships between landholders and others in natural resource management. We argue that for a more collaborative approach; we need to build relationships based on understanding, trust, respect, ownership and partnerships between rural communities, landholders, education and research institutions and government agencies as recognised in reconciliation ecology.
AB - In this article, we use an autoethnographic approach to explore relationships between landholders and government agencies and natural resource management projects. We use this exploration to argue for a holistic, collaborative approach to decision making around the implementation of biodiversity conservation on private and public land. This approach aligns with principles underpinning reconciliation ecology, which emphasises the inclusion of grass-roots communities for promoting biodiversity conservation in human-dominated landscapes where approaches to the management of natural resources may be contested. We present three projects (Environmental Champions; Fencing Incentive programmes; Plains-wanderer programme) and other research from the Mid-Murray Valley region of southern New South Wales to highlight the positive and negative aspects of relationships between landholders and others in natural resource management. We argue that for a more collaborative approach; we need to build relationships based on understanding, trust, respect, ownership and partnerships between rural communities, landholders, education and research institutions and government agencies as recognised in reconciliation ecology.
KW - landholder
KW - Research collaboration
KW - Murray Valley
KW - natural resource management
KW - reconciliation ecology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138419106&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85138419106&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/emr.12560
DO - 10.1111/emr.12560
M3 - Article
SN - 1442-7001
VL - 23
SP - 175
EP - 183
JO - Ecological Management and Restoration
JF - Ecological Management and Restoration
IS - 2
ER -