Biodiversity on the brink

Evaluating a transdisciplinary research collaboration

Michael Mitchell, Susan A. Moore, Sarah Clement, Michael Lockwood, Gill Anderson, Suzie M. Gaynor, Louise Gilfedder, Ross Rowe, Barbara Norman, Edward C. Lefroy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Global biodiversity is facing an extinction crisis. Australia has one of the highest terrestrial species extinction rates in the world. Scientists, policy advisors and governments have recommended that the issue be addressed at a landscape-scale, while noting that there are significant knowledge gaps that are hampering implementation of such an approach. From 2011–2015, the Australian Government funded a transdisciplinary research program, the Landscapes and Policy Hub, to meet this need. Transdisciplinary research is widely acknowledged as essential to address the complexity of contemporary environmental problems. Given that such research programs are in their infancy, it is important to evaluate their efficacy and provide an empirical basis for improving their design. This paper presents an evaluation of the strategies fostering transdisciplinarity adopted by the Landscapes and Policy Hub. A heavy emphasis on communication, with skilled knowledge brokering, regular face-to-face meetings using participatory activities and shared field engagements enhanced transdisciplinary interaction between researchers and research users. However, establishing a fully integrated interdisciplinary research program remained a challenge. Efforts to enable shared conceptual frameworks to emerge through adaptive application of theory in practice could have been balanced with increased effort at the outset for researchers and research users to collaboratively formulate shared research questions, leading to the establishment of teams that could address these questions through cross-mobilisation of interdisciplinary expertise.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalJournal for Nature Conservation
Volume40
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

biodiversity
research program
extinction
conceptual framework
mobilization
communication
policy
need
evaluation
interdisciplinary research
world
rate

Cite this

Mitchell, M., Moore, S. A., Clement, S., Lockwood, M., Anderson, G., Gaynor, S. M., ... Lefroy, E. C. (2017). Biodiversity on the brink: Evaluating a transdisciplinary research collaboration. Journal for Nature Conservation, 40, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2017.08.002
Mitchell, Michael ; Moore, Susan A. ; Clement, Sarah ; Lockwood, Michael ; Anderson, Gill ; Gaynor, Suzie M. ; Gilfedder, Louise ; Rowe, Ross ; Norman, Barbara ; Lefroy, Edward C. / Biodiversity on the brink : Evaluating a transdisciplinary research collaboration. In: Journal for Nature Conservation. 2017 ; Vol. 40. pp. 1-11.
@article{6d724ebf83e54b0ca0440ae0f8978c24,
title = "Biodiversity on the brink: Evaluating a transdisciplinary research collaboration",
abstract = "Global biodiversity is facing an extinction crisis. Australia has one of the highest terrestrial species extinction rates in the world. Scientists, policy advisors and governments have recommended that the issue be addressed at a landscape-scale, while noting that there are significant knowledge gaps that are hampering implementation of such an approach. From 2011–2015, the Australian Government funded a transdisciplinary research program, the Landscapes and Policy Hub, to meet this need. Transdisciplinary research is widely acknowledged as essential to address the complexity of contemporary environmental problems. Given that such research programs are in their infancy, it is important to evaluate their efficacy and provide an empirical basis for improving their design. This paper presents an evaluation of the strategies fostering transdisciplinarity adopted by the Landscapes and Policy Hub. A heavy emphasis on communication, with skilled knowledge brokering, regular face-to-face meetings using participatory activities and shared field engagements enhanced transdisciplinary interaction between researchers and research users. However, establishing a fully integrated interdisciplinary research program remained a challenge. Efforts to enable shared conceptual frameworks to emerge through adaptive application of theory in practice could have been balanced with increased effort at the outset for researchers and research users to collaboratively formulate shared research questions, leading to the establishment of teams that could address these questions through cross-mobilisation of interdisciplinary expertise.",
keywords = "Integrative research, Knowledge brokering, Landscape-scale conservation management, Problem-oriented interdisciplinary research, Research project evaluation, Transdisciplinarity",
author = "Michael Mitchell and Moore, {Susan A.} and Sarah Clement and Michael Lockwood and Gill Anderson and Gaynor, {Suzie M.} and Louise Gilfedder and Ross Rowe and Barbara Norman and Lefroy, {Edward C.}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jnc.2017.08.002",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Journal for Nature Conservation",
issn = "1617-1381",
publisher = "Urban und Fischer Verlag GmbH und Co. KG",

}

Mitchell, M, Moore, SA, Clement, S, Lockwood, M, Anderson, G, Gaynor, SM, Gilfedder, L, Rowe, R, Norman, B & Lefroy, EC 2017, 'Biodiversity on the brink: Evaluating a transdisciplinary research collaboration', Journal for Nature Conservation, vol. 40, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2017.08.002

Biodiversity on the brink : Evaluating a transdisciplinary research collaboration. / Mitchell, Michael; Moore, Susan A.; Clement, Sarah; Lockwood, Michael; Anderson, Gill; Gaynor, Suzie M.; Gilfedder, Louise; Rowe, Ross; Norman, Barbara; Lefroy, Edward C.

In: Journal for Nature Conservation, Vol. 40, 01.12.2017, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biodiversity on the brink

T2 - Evaluating a transdisciplinary research collaboration

AU - Mitchell, Michael

AU - Moore, Susan A.

AU - Clement, Sarah

AU - Lockwood, Michael

AU - Anderson, Gill

AU - Gaynor, Suzie M.

AU - Gilfedder, Louise

AU - Rowe, Ross

AU - Norman, Barbara

AU - Lefroy, Edward C.

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Global biodiversity is facing an extinction crisis. Australia has one of the highest terrestrial species extinction rates in the world. Scientists, policy advisors and governments have recommended that the issue be addressed at a landscape-scale, while noting that there are significant knowledge gaps that are hampering implementation of such an approach. From 2011–2015, the Australian Government funded a transdisciplinary research program, the Landscapes and Policy Hub, to meet this need. Transdisciplinary research is widely acknowledged as essential to address the complexity of contemporary environmental problems. Given that such research programs are in their infancy, it is important to evaluate their efficacy and provide an empirical basis for improving their design. This paper presents an evaluation of the strategies fostering transdisciplinarity adopted by the Landscapes and Policy Hub. A heavy emphasis on communication, with skilled knowledge brokering, regular face-to-face meetings using participatory activities and shared field engagements enhanced transdisciplinary interaction between researchers and research users. However, establishing a fully integrated interdisciplinary research program remained a challenge. Efforts to enable shared conceptual frameworks to emerge through adaptive application of theory in practice could have been balanced with increased effort at the outset for researchers and research users to collaboratively formulate shared research questions, leading to the establishment of teams that could address these questions through cross-mobilisation of interdisciplinary expertise.

AB - Global biodiversity is facing an extinction crisis. Australia has one of the highest terrestrial species extinction rates in the world. Scientists, policy advisors and governments have recommended that the issue be addressed at a landscape-scale, while noting that there are significant knowledge gaps that are hampering implementation of such an approach. From 2011–2015, the Australian Government funded a transdisciplinary research program, the Landscapes and Policy Hub, to meet this need. Transdisciplinary research is widely acknowledged as essential to address the complexity of contemporary environmental problems. Given that such research programs are in their infancy, it is important to evaluate their efficacy and provide an empirical basis for improving their design. This paper presents an evaluation of the strategies fostering transdisciplinarity adopted by the Landscapes and Policy Hub. A heavy emphasis on communication, with skilled knowledge brokering, regular face-to-face meetings using participatory activities and shared field engagements enhanced transdisciplinary interaction between researchers and research users. However, establishing a fully integrated interdisciplinary research program remained a challenge. Efforts to enable shared conceptual frameworks to emerge through adaptive application of theory in practice could have been balanced with increased effort at the outset for researchers and research users to collaboratively formulate shared research questions, leading to the establishment of teams that could address these questions through cross-mobilisation of interdisciplinary expertise.

KW - Integrative research

KW - Knowledge brokering

KW - Landscape-scale conservation management

KW - Problem-oriented interdisciplinary research

KW - Research project evaluation

KW - Transdisciplinarity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028356304&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028356304&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jnc.2017.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jnc.2017.08.002

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Journal for Nature Conservation

JF - Journal for Nature Conservation

SN - 1617-1381

ER -