TY - JOUR
T1 - Blood product administration in the prehospital setting
T2 - A scoping review
AU - Turnbull, Caitlin
AU - Clegg, Lisa
AU - Santhakumar, Abishek
AU - Micalos, Peter S.
PY - 2024/8
Y1 - 2024/8
N2 - Objectives: Implementing prehospital blood products for treating hemorrhagic shock has been utilized globally in military and civilian settings. This review aims to compare various guidelines for using blood products, including the types of blood products, injuries, biomarkers (hemodynamic measurement) to indicate use, associated treatments and risks, and the logistical concerns of storage and wastage in the prehospital setting. Furthermore, it explores whether prehospital blood transfusions are beneficial and a safe treatment option. Methods: Data were collected using a systematic search and screening process of online databases CINAHL, Medline, and Scopus, as well as by creating a PRISMA flow diagram to screen articles using inclusion and exclusion criteria. Forty-five articles were screened, with twenty-five excluded, resulting in twenty articles in this scoping review. Results: The most frequently used blood product used was red blood cells, with twelve studies using either red blood cells alone or in combination with other products. Indications for blood use varied across services, but all aimed to address hemodynamic instability as a primary indication for blood transfusion. Eleven studies recorded no adverse reactions. Only one study reported chills and shivers; however, it was unclear if blood products were the cause. Nine studies avoided logistical issues of storage and wastage to create a feasible rotation system. Conclusions: Prehospital blood was used in medical, trauma, and maternity-related hemorrhage. Many types of blood products are in use, ranging from component therapy to whole blood, with each protocol having different indications of use and treatment guidelines aimed at improving hemodynamic stability.
AB - Objectives: Implementing prehospital blood products for treating hemorrhagic shock has been utilized globally in military and civilian settings. This review aims to compare various guidelines for using blood products, including the types of blood products, injuries, biomarkers (hemodynamic measurement) to indicate use, associated treatments and risks, and the logistical concerns of storage and wastage in the prehospital setting. Furthermore, it explores whether prehospital blood transfusions are beneficial and a safe treatment option. Methods: Data were collected using a systematic search and screening process of online databases CINAHL, Medline, and Scopus, as well as by creating a PRISMA flow diagram to screen articles using inclusion and exclusion criteria. Forty-five articles were screened, with twenty-five excluded, resulting in twenty articles in this scoping review. Results: The most frequently used blood product used was red blood cells, with twelve studies using either red blood cells alone or in combination with other products. Indications for blood use varied across services, but all aimed to address hemodynamic instability as a primary indication for blood transfusion. Eleven studies recorded no adverse reactions. Only one study reported chills and shivers; however, it was unclear if blood products were the cause. Nine studies avoided logistical issues of storage and wastage to create a feasible rotation system. Conclusions: Prehospital blood was used in medical, trauma, and maternity-related hemorrhage. Many types of blood products are in use, ranging from component therapy to whole blood, with each protocol having different indications of use and treatment guidelines aimed at improving hemodynamic stability.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85201530564&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85201530564&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10903127.2024.2386007
DO - 10.1080/10903127.2024.2386007
M3 - Article
C2 - 39159401
SN - 1090-3127
JO - Prehospital Emergency Care
JF - Prehospital Emergency Care
ER -