Brian Selznick's 'The Invention of Hugo Cabret', Martin Scorsese's 'Hugo' and the Theft of Subjectivity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

173 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Sanders (2006) and Hutcheon (2006) are among the many theorists who challenge the Criterion adaptation of 'fidelity', and yet the frequent response to Martin Scorsese's Academy Award-winning film 'Hugo' is that it is faithful to Brian Selznick's Caldecott Medal-winning book 'The Invention of Hugo Cabret'. This paper argues that in each case the medium determines a significant difference in the construction of subjectivity. The book's preoccupation with theft indicates the Lacanian concern with the origin of subjectivity and the implied author's subtextual guilt about his dependence on the work of another artist. The film's shift in emphasis to the necessity of relationships and family, however, parallels Kristeva's assumption that intertextuality is inevitable. As Geraghty (2009) points out, adaptation is by definition dependent on another text. Consequently, Scorsese's 'Hugo' ignores the book's concern with originality and, at a time when film is again being repositioned by technological change, celebrates continuity and the heritage of the medium.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)26-37
Number of pages12
JournalRevista Soletras
Volume24
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Theft
Subjectivity
Invention
Martin Scorsese
Fidelity
Intertextuality
Heritage
Implied Author
Technological Change
Julia Kristeva
Guilt
Medal
Artist
Originality
Continuity
Theorists

Cite this

@article{d1b525753699467b8c9421c842532062,
title = "Brian Selznick's 'The Invention of Hugo Cabret', Martin Scorsese's 'Hugo' and the Theft of Subjectivity",
abstract = "Sanders (2006) and Hutcheon (2006) are among the many theorists who challenge the Criterion adaptation of 'fidelity', and yet the frequent response to Martin Scorsese's Academy Award-winning film 'Hugo' is that it is faithful to Brian Selznick's Caldecott Medal-winning book 'The Invention of Hugo Cabret'. This paper argues that in each case the medium determines a significant difference in the construction of subjectivity. The book's preoccupation with theft indicates the Lacanian concern with the origin of subjectivity and the implied author's subtextual guilt about his dependence on the work of another artist. The film's shift in emphasis to the necessity of relationships and family, however, parallels Kristeva's assumption that intertextuality is inevitable. As Geraghty (2009) points out, adaptation is by definition dependent on another text. Consequently, Scorsese's 'Hugo' ignores the book's concern with originality and, at a time when film is again being repositioned by technological change, celebrates continuity and the heritage of the medium.",
keywords = "Open access version available, Adaptation, Brian Selznick, Hugo, Martin Scorsese, Subjectivity",
author = "Mark Macleod",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Revista Soletras. ISSNs: 2316-8838;",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "26--37",
journal = "Revista Soletras",
issn = "2316-8838",
number = "2",

}

Brian Selznick's 'The Invention of Hugo Cabret', Martin Scorsese's 'Hugo' and the Theft of Subjectivity. / Macleod, Mark.

In: Revista Soletras, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2012, p. 26-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Brian Selznick's 'The Invention of Hugo Cabret', Martin Scorsese's 'Hugo' and the Theft of Subjectivity

AU - Macleod, Mark

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Revista Soletras. ISSNs: 2316-8838;

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Sanders (2006) and Hutcheon (2006) are among the many theorists who challenge the Criterion adaptation of 'fidelity', and yet the frequent response to Martin Scorsese's Academy Award-winning film 'Hugo' is that it is faithful to Brian Selznick's Caldecott Medal-winning book 'The Invention of Hugo Cabret'. This paper argues that in each case the medium determines a significant difference in the construction of subjectivity. The book's preoccupation with theft indicates the Lacanian concern with the origin of subjectivity and the implied author's subtextual guilt about his dependence on the work of another artist. The film's shift in emphasis to the necessity of relationships and family, however, parallels Kristeva's assumption that intertextuality is inevitable. As Geraghty (2009) points out, adaptation is by definition dependent on another text. Consequently, Scorsese's 'Hugo' ignores the book's concern with originality and, at a time when film is again being repositioned by technological change, celebrates continuity and the heritage of the medium.

AB - Sanders (2006) and Hutcheon (2006) are among the many theorists who challenge the Criterion adaptation of 'fidelity', and yet the frequent response to Martin Scorsese's Academy Award-winning film 'Hugo' is that it is faithful to Brian Selznick's Caldecott Medal-winning book 'The Invention of Hugo Cabret'. This paper argues that in each case the medium determines a significant difference in the construction of subjectivity. The book's preoccupation with theft indicates the Lacanian concern with the origin of subjectivity and the implied author's subtextual guilt about his dependence on the work of another artist. The film's shift in emphasis to the necessity of relationships and family, however, parallels Kristeva's assumption that intertextuality is inevitable. As Geraghty (2009) points out, adaptation is by definition dependent on another text. Consequently, Scorsese's 'Hugo' ignores the book's concern with originality and, at a time when film is again being repositioned by technological change, celebrates continuity and the heritage of the medium.

KW - Open access version available

KW - Adaptation

KW - Brian Selznick

KW - Hugo

KW - Martin Scorsese

KW - Subjectivity

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 26

EP - 37

JO - Revista Soletras

JF - Revista Soletras

SN - 2316-8838

IS - 2

ER -