Bridging the gap between policy and management of natural resources

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

16 Downloads (Pure)


This chapter provides insights for regional natural resource management (NRM) practitioners seeking to influence property management by rural landholders. We aim to bridge the gap between policy and management by providing improved understanding of changes in the social structure of rural areas and the impact of these changes and other influences on landholder decisions. We draw upon a number of theoretical frameworks, including the adoption literature. We also draw upon a substantial body of empirical research exploring the social structure of rural areas and landholder implementation of sustainable farming and biodiversity practices, including recent studies undertaken in the Corangamite and Wimmera regions of Victoria. Our research was intended to help regional NRM practitioners engage rural landholders; develop an effective mix of policy approaches; and evaluate the accomplishment of intermediate NRM program objectives. Key findings include: (1) only part of the implementation of conservation activities by landholders can be directly attributed to investment by NRM programs; (2) investing in NRM programs that engage human and social capital is an effective way of influencing the property management of landholders; and (3) NRM practitioners need to be aware that they will be engaging a very different cohort of rural landholders than in the past, with significantly increased proportions of non-farmers and absentee property owners.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationChanging land management
Subtitle of host publicationAdoption of new practices by rural landholders
EditorsDavid Pannell, Frank Vanclay
Place of PublicationCollingwood
PublisherCSIRO Publishing
Number of pages24
ISBN (Electronic) 9780643101739
ISBN (Print)9780643100381
Publication statusPublished - 2011


Dive into the research topics of 'Bridging the gap between policy and management of natural resources'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this