TY - JOUR
T1 - Bridging the research-practice gap in healthcare
T2 - A rapid review of research translation centres in England and Australia
AU - Robinson, Tracy
AU - Bailey, Cate
AU - Morris, Heather
AU - Burns, Prue
AU - Melder, Angela
AU - Croft, Charlotte
AU - Spyridonidis, Dmitrios
AU - Bismantara, Halyo
AU - Skouteris, Helen
AU - Teede, Helena
PY - 2020/10/9
Y1 - 2020/10/9
N2 - BackgroundLarge-scale
partnerships between universities and health services are widely seen
as vehicles for bridging the evidence–practice gap and for accelerating
the adoption of new evidence in healthcare. Recently, different versions
of these partnerships – often called academic health science centres –
have been established across the globe. Although they differ in
structure and processes, all aim to improve the integration of research
and education with health services. Collectively, these entities are
often referred to as Research Translation Centres (RTCs) and both
England and Australia have developed relatively new and funded examples
of these collaborative centres.MethodsThis
paper presents findings from a rapid review of RTCs in Australia and
England that aimed to identify their structures, leadership, workforce
development and strategies for involving communities and service users.
The review included published academic and grey literature with a
customised search of the Google search engine and RTC websites.ResultsRTCs
are complex system-level interventions that will need to disrupt the
current paradigms and silos inherent in healthcare, education and
research in order to meet their aims. This will require vision,
leadership, collaborations and shared learnings, alongside structures,
processes and strategies to deliver impact in the face of complexity.
The impact of RTCs in overcoming the deeply entrenched silos across
organisations, disciplines and sectors needs to be captured at the
systems, organisation and individual levels. This includes workforce
capacity and public and patient involvement that are vital to
understanding the evolution of RTCs. In addition, new models of
leadership are needed to support the brokering and mobilisation of
knowledge in complex organisations.ConclusionsThe
development and funding of RTCs represents one of the most significant
shifts in the health research landscape and it is imperative that we
continue to explore how we can progress the integration of research and
healthcare and ensure research meets stakeholder needs and is translated
via the collaborations supported by these organisations. Because RTCs
are a recent addition to the healthcare landscape in Australia, it is
instructive to review the processes and infrastructure needed to support
their implementation and applied health research in England.
AB - BackgroundLarge-scale
partnerships between universities and health services are widely seen
as vehicles for bridging the evidence–practice gap and for accelerating
the adoption of new evidence in healthcare. Recently, different versions
of these partnerships – often called academic health science centres –
have been established across the globe. Although they differ in
structure and processes, all aim to improve the integration of research
and education with health services. Collectively, these entities are
often referred to as Research Translation Centres (RTCs) and both
England and Australia have developed relatively new and funded examples
of these collaborative centres.MethodsThis
paper presents findings from a rapid review of RTCs in Australia and
England that aimed to identify their structures, leadership, workforce
development and strategies for involving communities and service users.
The review included published academic and grey literature with a
customised search of the Google search engine and RTC websites.ResultsRTCs
are complex system-level interventions that will need to disrupt the
current paradigms and silos inherent in healthcare, education and
research in order to meet their aims. This will require vision,
leadership, collaborations and shared learnings, alongside structures,
processes and strategies to deliver impact in the face of complexity.
The impact of RTCs in overcoming the deeply entrenched silos across
organisations, disciplines and sectors needs to be captured at the
systems, organisation and individual levels. This includes workforce
capacity and public and patient involvement that are vital to
understanding the evolution of RTCs. In addition, new models of
leadership are needed to support the brokering and mobilisation of
knowledge in complex organisations.ConclusionsThe
development and funding of RTCs represents one of the most significant
shifts in the health research landscape and it is imperative that we
continue to explore how we can progress the integration of research and
healthcare and ensure research meets stakeholder needs and is translated
via the collaborations supported by these organisations. Because RTCs
are a recent addition to the healthcare landscape in Australia, it is
instructive to review the processes and infrastructure needed to support
their implementation and applied health research in England.
KW - leadership
KW - Research Translation Centres
KW - workforce development
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092537261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092537261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12961-020-00621-w
DO - 10.1186/s12961-020-00621-w
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33036634
AN - SCOPUS:85092537261
SN - 1478-4505
VL - 18
JO - Health Research Policy and Systems
JF - Health Research Policy and Systems
M1 - 117
ER -