TY - JOUR
T1 - BYOB as a Risk-reduction Strategy (RRS) for Wine Consumers in the Australian On-premise Foodservice Sector
T2 - Exploratory Insights
AU - Bruwer, Johan
AU - Rawbone-Viljoen, Christopher
N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = March, 2013; Journal title (773t) = International Journal of Hospitality Management. ISSNs: 0278-4319;
PY - 2013/3
Y1 - 2013/3
N2 - This baseline exploratory study investigated the main drivers of perceived risk of wine consumers in the Australian restaurant environment and the effectiveness of bring-your-own-bottle (BYOB) of wine as a risk-reduction strategy (RRS). The BYOB ‘culture’ is well-established with 22% of respondents reporting they engaged in BYOB the last time they dined out. The main drivers of risk were: ordering a wine that complements the meal (functional); ordering a wine that suits the occasion (functional); choosing wines that will please the dining group (social); fear of being caught driving while intoxicated (physical); and the reputation of the restaurant (functional). Functional risk was by far the most significant risk type, followed by physical and social risk. The risk measurement scale returned a Cronbach alpha of 0.69 indicating the model had acceptable reliability for an exploratory study. In testing the relationship between risk types and using BYOB as a RRS significant correlations exist between functional risk and engaging in BYOB when celebrating a special occasion (H2); social risk to bring wines that please the dining group (H3); financial risk to combat high prices on wine lists (H4); and time risk to avoid the inconvenience and time spent on selecting, ordering and waiting for a wine to be fetched and opened (H5). These findings suggest that BYOB should be recognised as a RRS in its own right.
AB - This baseline exploratory study investigated the main drivers of perceived risk of wine consumers in the Australian restaurant environment and the effectiveness of bring-your-own-bottle (BYOB) of wine as a risk-reduction strategy (RRS). The BYOB ‘culture’ is well-established with 22% of respondents reporting they engaged in BYOB the last time they dined out. The main drivers of risk were: ordering a wine that complements the meal (functional); ordering a wine that suits the occasion (functional); choosing wines that will please the dining group (social); fear of being caught driving while intoxicated (physical); and the reputation of the restaurant (functional). Functional risk was by far the most significant risk type, followed by physical and social risk. The risk measurement scale returned a Cronbach alpha of 0.69 indicating the model had acceptable reliability for an exploratory study. In testing the relationship between risk types and using BYOB as a RRS significant correlations exist between functional risk and engaging in BYOB when celebrating a special occasion (H2); social risk to bring wines that please the dining group (H3); financial risk to combat high prices on wine lists (H4); and time risk to avoid the inconvenience and time spent on selecting, ordering and waiting for a wine to be fetched and opened (H5). These findings suggest that BYOB should be recognised as a RRS in its own right.
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.03.016
DO - 10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.03.016
M3 - Article
SN - 0278-4319
VL - 32
SP - 21
EP - 30
JO - International Journal of Hospitality Management
JF - International Journal of Hospitality Management
IS - 1
ER -