Can resilience thinking provide useful insights for those examining efforts to transform contemporary agriculture?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Agricultural industries in developed countries may need to consider transformative change if they are to respond effectively to contemporary challenges, including a changing climate. In this paper we apply a resilience lens to analyze a deliberate attempt by Australian governments to restructure the dairy industry, and then utilize this analysis to assess the usefulness of resilience thinking for contemporary agricultural transformations. Our analysis draws on findings from a case study of market deregulation in the subtropical dairy industry. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with dairy producers, their service providers, and industry and government staff. We found the adaptive cycle concept contributed to understanding how deregulation changed industry structures and working practices, how those changes led to feedbacks within the production system and supply chain, and how the industry following deregulation has experienced periods of stability and instability. Regime shifts were associated with an increase in demand for human capital, a degradation of cognitive social capital and a reduction in farm income. Findings identified that were not readily explained by the resilience thinking conceptual framework include a producer's ability to anticipate and make choices and the change in social and power relationships in the industry.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)371-384
Number of pages14
JournalAgriculture and Human Values
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

government deregulation
dairy industry
agriculture
industry
social capital
social change
farm income
agricultural industry
supply chain
Lens
developed countries
interviews
dairies
production technology
climate change
case studies
degradation

Cite this

@article{11d363b579054a19a49f3685e6cf892c,
title = "Can resilience thinking provide useful insights for those examining efforts to transform contemporary agriculture?",
abstract = "Agricultural industries in developed countries may need to consider transformative change if they are to respond effectively to contemporary challenges, including a changing climate. In this paper we apply a resilience lens to analyze a deliberate attempt by Australian governments to restructure the dairy industry, and then utilize this analysis to assess the usefulness of resilience thinking for contemporary agricultural transformations. Our analysis draws on findings from a case study of market deregulation in the subtropical dairy industry. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with dairy producers, their service providers, and industry and government staff. We found the adaptive cycle concept contributed to understanding how deregulation changed industry structures and working practices, how those changes led to feedbacks within the production system and supply chain, and how the industry following deregulation has experienced periods of stability and instability. Regime shifts were associated with an increase in demand for human capital, a degradation of cognitive social capital and a reduction in farm income. Findings identified that were not readily explained by the resilience thinking conceptual framework include a producer's ability to anticipate and make choices and the change in social and power relationships in the industry.",
keywords = "Australia, Dairy industry, Market deregulation, Resilience theory, Transformation",
author = "Katrina Sinclair and Allan Curtis and Emily Mendham and Michael Mitchell",
note = "Includes bibliographical references.",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/s10460-014-9488-4",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "371--384",
journal = "Agriculture and Human Values",
issn = "0889-048X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can resilience thinking provide useful insights for those examining efforts to transform contemporary agriculture?

AU - Sinclair, Katrina

AU - Curtis, Allan

AU - Mendham, Emily

AU - Mitchell, Michael

N1 - Includes bibliographical references.

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Agricultural industries in developed countries may need to consider transformative change if they are to respond effectively to contemporary challenges, including a changing climate. In this paper we apply a resilience lens to analyze a deliberate attempt by Australian governments to restructure the dairy industry, and then utilize this analysis to assess the usefulness of resilience thinking for contemporary agricultural transformations. Our analysis draws on findings from a case study of market deregulation in the subtropical dairy industry. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with dairy producers, their service providers, and industry and government staff. We found the adaptive cycle concept contributed to understanding how deregulation changed industry structures and working practices, how those changes led to feedbacks within the production system and supply chain, and how the industry following deregulation has experienced periods of stability and instability. Regime shifts were associated with an increase in demand for human capital, a degradation of cognitive social capital and a reduction in farm income. Findings identified that were not readily explained by the resilience thinking conceptual framework include a producer's ability to anticipate and make choices and the change in social and power relationships in the industry.

AB - Agricultural industries in developed countries may need to consider transformative change if they are to respond effectively to contemporary challenges, including a changing climate. In this paper we apply a resilience lens to analyze a deliberate attempt by Australian governments to restructure the dairy industry, and then utilize this analysis to assess the usefulness of resilience thinking for contemporary agricultural transformations. Our analysis draws on findings from a case study of market deregulation in the subtropical dairy industry. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with dairy producers, their service providers, and industry and government staff. We found the adaptive cycle concept contributed to understanding how deregulation changed industry structures and working practices, how those changes led to feedbacks within the production system and supply chain, and how the industry following deregulation has experienced periods of stability and instability. Regime shifts were associated with an increase in demand for human capital, a degradation of cognitive social capital and a reduction in farm income. Findings identified that were not readily explained by the resilience thinking conceptual framework include a producer's ability to anticipate and make choices and the change in social and power relationships in the industry.

KW - Australia

KW - Dairy industry

KW - Market deregulation

KW - Resilience theory

KW - Transformation

U2 - 10.1007/s10460-014-9488-4

DO - 10.1007/s10460-014-9488-4

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 371

EP - 384

JO - Agriculture and Human Values

JF - Agriculture and Human Values

SN - 0889-048X

IS - 3

ER -