Caution using data from triaxial accelerometers housed in player tracking units during running

Suzi Edwards, Samuel White, Seaton Humphreys, Robert Robergs, Nicholas O’Dwyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Usage of accelerometers within player tracking devices in sport to quantify load, vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) or energy expenditure is contrary to placement guidelines. This study aimed to determine whether trunk-mounted accelerometers were a valid and reliable method to estimate thoracic segment or centre of gravity (COG) acceleration or vGRF, and the whether the elasticised harness contributes to the overestimation of acceleration. Ten male amateur rugby players performed five linear running tasks per lower limb at three speeds, twice, each with a different player tracking unit. Three-dimensional data were recorded and triaxial accelerometers were attached lateral to the device on the harness and skin and both shanks. Accelerometers demonstrated poor reliability (ICC:0.0–0.67), high variability (CV%:14–33%) and change in mean (41–160%), and were not valid to estimate vertical acceleration of the COG and thoracic segment nor vGRF. Caution is advised when utilising trunk-mounted triaxial accelerometer data as it is not a valid or reliable means to estimate peak vertical acceleration for its thoracic location nor whole-body COG acceleration or vGRF during running. To improve player tracking instrument validity and reliability, a new attachment method and/or harness material(s), that reduce or eliminate extraneous acceleration during running, are urgently required.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)810-818
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
Volume37
Issue number7
Early online date11 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 03 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Running
Gravitation
Thorax
Equipment and Supplies
Football
Reproducibility of Results
Energy Metabolism
Sports
Lower Extremity
Guidelines
Skin

Cite this

Edwards, Suzi ; White, Samuel ; Humphreys, Seaton ; Robergs, Robert ; O’Dwyer, Nicholas. / Caution using data from triaxial accelerometers housed in player tracking units during running. In: Journal of Sports Sciences. 2019 ; Vol. 37, No. 7. pp. 810-818.
@article{52b72aab558640a9a585c7feb547e988,
title = "Caution using data from triaxial accelerometers housed in player tracking units during running",
abstract = "Usage of accelerometers within player tracking devices in sport to quantify load, vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) or energy expenditure is contrary to placement guidelines. This study aimed to determine whether trunk-mounted accelerometers were a valid and reliable method to estimate thoracic segment or centre of gravity (COG) acceleration or vGRF, and the whether the elasticised harness contributes to the overestimation of acceleration. Ten male amateur rugby players performed five linear running tasks per lower limb at three speeds, twice, each with a different player tracking unit. Three-dimensional data were recorded and triaxial accelerometers were attached lateral to the device on the harness and skin and both shanks. Accelerometers demonstrated poor reliability (ICC:0.0–0.67), high variability (CV{\%}:14–33{\%}) and change in mean (41–160{\%}), and were not valid to estimate vertical acceleration of the COG and thoracic segment nor vGRF. Caution is advised when utilising trunk-mounted triaxial accelerometer data as it is not a valid or reliable means to estimate peak vertical acceleration for its thoracic location nor whole-body COG acceleration or vGRF during running. To improve player tracking instrument validity and reliability, a new attachment method and/or harness material(s), that reduce or eliminate extraneous acceleration during running, are urgently required.",
keywords = "athletic training, Biomechanics, motion analysis, physical performance",
author = "Suzi Edwards and Samuel White and Seaton Humphreys and Robert Robergs and Nicholas O’Dwyer",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/02640414.2018.1527675",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "810--818",
journal = "Journal of Sports Sciences",
issn = "0264-0414",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "7",

}

Caution using data from triaxial accelerometers housed in player tracking units during running. / Edwards, Suzi; White, Samuel; Humphreys, Seaton; Robergs, Robert; O’Dwyer, Nicholas.

In: Journal of Sports Sciences, Vol. 37, No. 7, 03.04.2019, p. 810-818.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Caution using data from triaxial accelerometers housed in player tracking units during running

AU - Edwards, Suzi

AU - White, Samuel

AU - Humphreys, Seaton

AU - Robergs, Robert

AU - O’Dwyer, Nicholas

PY - 2019/4/3

Y1 - 2019/4/3

N2 - Usage of accelerometers within player tracking devices in sport to quantify load, vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) or energy expenditure is contrary to placement guidelines. This study aimed to determine whether trunk-mounted accelerometers were a valid and reliable method to estimate thoracic segment or centre of gravity (COG) acceleration or vGRF, and the whether the elasticised harness contributes to the overestimation of acceleration. Ten male amateur rugby players performed five linear running tasks per lower limb at three speeds, twice, each with a different player tracking unit. Three-dimensional data were recorded and triaxial accelerometers were attached lateral to the device on the harness and skin and both shanks. Accelerometers demonstrated poor reliability (ICC:0.0–0.67), high variability (CV%:14–33%) and change in mean (41–160%), and were not valid to estimate vertical acceleration of the COG and thoracic segment nor vGRF. Caution is advised when utilising trunk-mounted triaxial accelerometer data as it is not a valid or reliable means to estimate peak vertical acceleration for its thoracic location nor whole-body COG acceleration or vGRF during running. To improve player tracking instrument validity and reliability, a new attachment method and/or harness material(s), that reduce or eliminate extraneous acceleration during running, are urgently required.

AB - Usage of accelerometers within player tracking devices in sport to quantify load, vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) or energy expenditure is contrary to placement guidelines. This study aimed to determine whether trunk-mounted accelerometers were a valid and reliable method to estimate thoracic segment or centre of gravity (COG) acceleration or vGRF, and the whether the elasticised harness contributes to the overestimation of acceleration. Ten male amateur rugby players performed five linear running tasks per lower limb at three speeds, twice, each with a different player tracking unit. Three-dimensional data were recorded and triaxial accelerometers were attached lateral to the device on the harness and skin and both shanks. Accelerometers demonstrated poor reliability (ICC:0.0–0.67), high variability (CV%:14–33%) and change in mean (41–160%), and were not valid to estimate vertical acceleration of the COG and thoracic segment nor vGRF. Caution is advised when utilising trunk-mounted triaxial accelerometer data as it is not a valid or reliable means to estimate peak vertical acceleration for its thoracic location nor whole-body COG acceleration or vGRF during running. To improve player tracking instrument validity and reliability, a new attachment method and/or harness material(s), that reduce or eliminate extraneous acceleration during running, are urgently required.

KW - athletic training

KW - Biomechanics

KW - motion analysis

KW - physical performance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054795561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054795561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02640414.2018.1527675

DO - 10.1080/02640414.2018.1527675

M3 - Article

C2 - 30306824

AN - SCOPUS:85054795561

VL - 37

SP - 810

EP - 818

JO - Journal of Sports Sciences

JF - Journal of Sports Sciences

SN - 0264-0414

IS - 7

ER -