Changing the perception of police culture: Recognising masculinity diversity and difference in a “dirty hands” vocation

Michael Kennedy, Philip Birch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to problematise the application of hegemonic masculinity to police practice and culture. Design/methodology/approach: This paper offers a viewpoint and is a discussion paper critiquing the application of hegemonic masculinity to police officers, their practice and culture. Findings: The paper suggests that a broader conceptualisation of masculinity, offered by scholars such as Demetriou (2001), is required when considering policing and its culture, in order to more accurately reflect the activity and those involved in it. Research limitations/implications: Writings concerning police practice and culture, both in the media and academic discourse, are questionable due to the application of hegemonic masculinity. The application of hegemonic masculinity can create a biased perception of policing and police officers. Practical implications: The paper helps to engender a more accurate and balanced examination of the police, their culture and practice when writing about policing institutions and encourage social institutions such as academia to address bias in their examination of policing institutions and police officers. Originality/value: There has been limited consideration in regards to multiple masculinities, police practice and culture.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-57
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Forensic Practice
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Masculinity
Police
Occupations
masculinity
police
Hand
police officer
examination
social institution
discourse
methodology
trend
Values
Research

Cite this

@article{d02fb48c692b443587dbc92978f7a6c4,
title = "Changing the perception of police culture: Recognising masculinity diversity and difference in a “dirty hands” vocation",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to problematise the application of hegemonic masculinity to police practice and culture. Design/methodology/approach: This paper offers a viewpoint and is a discussion paper critiquing the application of hegemonic masculinity to police officers, their practice and culture. Findings: The paper suggests that a broader conceptualisation of masculinity, offered by scholars such as Demetriou (2001), is required when considering policing and its culture, in order to more accurately reflect the activity and those involved in it. Research limitations/implications: Writings concerning police practice and culture, both in the media and academic discourse, are questionable due to the application of hegemonic masculinity. The application of hegemonic masculinity can create a biased perception of policing and police officers. Practical implications: The paper helps to engender a more accurate and balanced examination of the police, their culture and practice when writing about policing institutions and encourage social institutions such as academia to address bias in their examination of policing institutions and police officers. Originality/value: There has been limited consideration in regards to multiple masculinities, police practice and culture.",
keywords = "Dirty hands vocation, Hegemonic masculinity, Multiple masculinities, Police culture, Police masculinity, Police practice",
author = "Michael Kennedy and Philip Birch",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/JFP-06-2017-0020",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "54--57",
journal = "British Journal of Forensic Practice",
issn = "1463-6646",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Limited",
number = "1",

}

Changing the perception of police culture : Recognising masculinity diversity and difference in a “dirty hands” vocation. / Kennedy, Michael; Birch, Philip.

In: Journal of Forensic Practice, Vol. 20, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 54-57.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changing the perception of police culture

T2 - Recognising masculinity diversity and difference in a “dirty hands” vocation

AU - Kennedy, Michael

AU - Birch, Philip

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to problematise the application of hegemonic masculinity to police practice and culture. Design/methodology/approach: This paper offers a viewpoint and is a discussion paper critiquing the application of hegemonic masculinity to police officers, their practice and culture. Findings: The paper suggests that a broader conceptualisation of masculinity, offered by scholars such as Demetriou (2001), is required when considering policing and its culture, in order to more accurately reflect the activity and those involved in it. Research limitations/implications: Writings concerning police practice and culture, both in the media and academic discourse, are questionable due to the application of hegemonic masculinity. The application of hegemonic masculinity can create a biased perception of policing and police officers. Practical implications: The paper helps to engender a more accurate and balanced examination of the police, their culture and practice when writing about policing institutions and encourage social institutions such as academia to address bias in their examination of policing institutions and police officers. Originality/value: There has been limited consideration in regards to multiple masculinities, police practice and culture.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to problematise the application of hegemonic masculinity to police practice and culture. Design/methodology/approach: This paper offers a viewpoint and is a discussion paper critiquing the application of hegemonic masculinity to police officers, their practice and culture. Findings: The paper suggests that a broader conceptualisation of masculinity, offered by scholars such as Demetriou (2001), is required when considering policing and its culture, in order to more accurately reflect the activity and those involved in it. Research limitations/implications: Writings concerning police practice and culture, both in the media and academic discourse, are questionable due to the application of hegemonic masculinity. The application of hegemonic masculinity can create a biased perception of policing and police officers. Practical implications: The paper helps to engender a more accurate and balanced examination of the police, their culture and practice when writing about policing institutions and encourage social institutions such as academia to address bias in their examination of policing institutions and police officers. Originality/value: There has been limited consideration in regards to multiple masculinities, police practice and culture.

KW - Dirty hands vocation

KW - Hegemonic masculinity

KW - Multiple masculinities

KW - Police culture

KW - Police masculinity

KW - Police practice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040253060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040253060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/JFP-06-2017-0020

DO - 10.1108/JFP-06-2017-0020

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85040253060

VL - 20

SP - 54

EP - 57

JO - British Journal of Forensic Practice

JF - British Journal of Forensic Practice

SN - 1463-6646

IS - 1

ER -