Children and “junk food” advertising

Critique of a recent Australian study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A field experiment by Australian public health researchers Norman, Kelly, McMahon, and others allegedly demonstrated that primary school children's physical health is threatened by exposure to “junk food” advertising. Their study was published in the international health journal Appetite and was clearly intended to influence government regulatory policy. The methodology of the study was taken, without acknowledgement, from an earlier American study in the Journal of Consumer Research and much other research on children's consumer behavior, including pioneering studies conducted by the present author‚ was ignored. Also, quite unforgivably, the researchers neglected to cite Australia's already strict regulatory controls on and guidelines for advertising directed to children. The present author sent a rejoinder to Appetite pointing out the many problems with Norman et al.'s research and recommending that their article be withdrawn, but the editor insisted I revise it to remove almost all the criticisms, which I naturally refused to do. Instead, by publishing this article in JCB, the present author is hoping to make consumer researchers aware of the sort of poorly performed and ideologically influenced research relating to marketing and consumer behavior that is appearing in the health journals. The present article also contributes more generally by exposing problems that must be avoided in experimental research on consumer behavior.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)275-282
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Consumer Behaviour
Volume18
Issue number4
Early online date30 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 02 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Food
Research
Research Personnel
Appetite
Health
Child Behavior
Marketing
Public Health
Guidelines
Consumer Behavior

Cite this

@article{e5da99b72ea84500bf6cf5f078df8c35,
title = "Children and “junk food” advertising: Critique of a recent Australian study",
abstract = "A field experiment by Australian public health researchers Norman, Kelly, McMahon, and others allegedly demonstrated that primary school children's physical health is threatened by exposure to “junk food” advertising. Their study was published in the international health journal Appetite and was clearly intended to influence government regulatory policy. The methodology of the study was taken, without acknowledgement, from an earlier American study in the Journal of Consumer Research and much other research on children's consumer behavior, including pioneering studies conducted by the present author‚ was ignored. Also, quite unforgivably, the researchers neglected to cite Australia's already strict regulatory controls on and guidelines for advertising directed to children. The present author sent a rejoinder to Appetite pointing out the many problems with Norman et al.'s research and recommending that their article be withdrawn, but the editor insisted I revise it to remove almost all the criticisms, which I naturally refused to do. Instead, by publishing this article in JCB, the present author is hoping to make consumer researchers aware of the sort of poorly performed and ideologically influenced research relating to marketing and consumer behavior that is appearing in the health journals. The present article also contributes more generally by exposing problems that must be avoided in experimental research on consumer behavior.",
author = "Rossiter, {John R.}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1002/cb.1773",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "275--282",
journal = "Journal of Consumer Behaviour",
issn = "1472-0817",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "4",

}

Children and “junk food” advertising : Critique of a recent Australian study. / Rossiter, John R.

In: Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 18, No. 4, 02.07.2019, p. 275-282.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Children and “junk food” advertising

T2 - Critique of a recent Australian study

AU - Rossiter, John R.

PY - 2019/7/2

Y1 - 2019/7/2

N2 - A field experiment by Australian public health researchers Norman, Kelly, McMahon, and others allegedly demonstrated that primary school children's physical health is threatened by exposure to “junk food” advertising. Their study was published in the international health journal Appetite and was clearly intended to influence government regulatory policy. The methodology of the study was taken, without acknowledgement, from an earlier American study in the Journal of Consumer Research and much other research on children's consumer behavior, including pioneering studies conducted by the present author‚ was ignored. Also, quite unforgivably, the researchers neglected to cite Australia's already strict regulatory controls on and guidelines for advertising directed to children. The present author sent a rejoinder to Appetite pointing out the many problems with Norman et al.'s research and recommending that their article be withdrawn, but the editor insisted I revise it to remove almost all the criticisms, which I naturally refused to do. Instead, by publishing this article in JCB, the present author is hoping to make consumer researchers aware of the sort of poorly performed and ideologically influenced research relating to marketing and consumer behavior that is appearing in the health journals. The present article also contributes more generally by exposing problems that must be avoided in experimental research on consumer behavior.

AB - A field experiment by Australian public health researchers Norman, Kelly, McMahon, and others allegedly demonstrated that primary school children's physical health is threatened by exposure to “junk food” advertising. Their study was published in the international health journal Appetite and was clearly intended to influence government regulatory policy. The methodology of the study was taken, without acknowledgement, from an earlier American study in the Journal of Consumer Research and much other research on children's consumer behavior, including pioneering studies conducted by the present author‚ was ignored. Also, quite unforgivably, the researchers neglected to cite Australia's already strict regulatory controls on and guidelines for advertising directed to children. The present author sent a rejoinder to Appetite pointing out the many problems with Norman et al.'s research and recommending that their article be withdrawn, but the editor insisted I revise it to remove almost all the criticisms, which I naturally refused to do. Instead, by publishing this article in JCB, the present author is hoping to make consumer researchers aware of the sort of poorly performed and ideologically influenced research relating to marketing and consumer behavior that is appearing in the health journals. The present article also contributes more generally by exposing problems that must be avoided in experimental research on consumer behavior.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067382162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067382162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/cb.1773

DO - 10.1002/cb.1773

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 275

EP - 282

JO - Journal of Consumer Behaviour

JF - Journal of Consumer Behaviour

SN - 1472-0817

IS - 4

ER -