Choice Modelling and Tests of Benefit Transfer

Mark Morrison, Jeff Bennett, Russell Blamey, Jordan Louviere

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

121 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Benefit transfer is increasingly being used by decision makers as a way of estimating environmental values suitable for use in benefit cost analysis. However, recent studies examining the validity of benefit transfer of passive use values estimated using contingent valuation have rejected the hypothesis of convergent validity. In this article, we demonstrate the usage of a form of conjoint analysis known as choice modeling for benefit transfer. Choice modeling has been touted as being particularly suitable for benefit transfer because it is possible to allow for differences in environmental quality and socioeconomic characteristics when transferring benefit estimates. We demonstrate that choice modeling is suitable for benefit transfer, particularly when the transfers involve implicit prices. Second, we examine the circumstances in which benefit transfer of choice modeling derived value estimates is likely to be most valid. Two split sample tests were undertaken to achieve this objective. The evidence from these tests indicates that transfers across different case study sites are likely to be subject to less error than those across different populations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)161-170
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics
Volume84
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Cost-Benefit Analysis
Population
testing
contingent valuation
cost benefit analysis
ecological value
environmental quality
socioeconomics
case studies
Benefit transfer
Choice modelling
sampling

Cite this

Morrison, M., Bennett, J., Blamey, R., & Louviere, J. (2002). Choice Modelling and Tests of Benefit Transfer. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(1), 161-170.
Morrison, Mark ; Bennett, Jeff ; Blamey, Russell ; Louviere, Jordan. / Choice Modelling and Tests of Benefit Transfer. In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2002 ; Vol. 84, No. 1. pp. 161-170.
@article{0a7afd6efa9840b6b824894c9d29002b,
title = "Choice Modelling and Tests of Benefit Transfer",
abstract = "Benefit transfer is increasingly being used by decision makers as a way of estimating environmental values suitable for use in benefit cost analysis. However, recent studies examining the validity of benefit transfer of passive use values estimated using contingent valuation have rejected the hypothesis of convergent validity. In this article, we demonstrate the usage of a form of conjoint analysis known as choice modeling for benefit transfer. Choice modeling has been touted as being particularly suitable for benefit transfer because it is possible to allow for differences in environmental quality and socioeconomic characteristics when transferring benefit estimates. We demonstrate that choice modeling is suitable for benefit transfer, particularly when the transfers involve implicit prices. Second, we examine the circumstances in which benefit transfer of choice modeling derived value estimates is likely to be most valid. Two split sample tests were undertaken to achieve this objective. The evidence from these tests indicates that transfers across different case study sites are likely to be subject to less error than those across different populations.",
author = "Mark Morrison and Jeff Bennett and Russell Blamey and Jordan Louviere",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = American Journal of Agricultural Economics. ISSNs: 0002-9092;",
year = "2002",
language = "English",
volume = "84",
pages = "161--170",
journal = "American Journal of Agricultural Economics",
issn = "0002-9092",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

Morrison, M, Bennett, J, Blamey, R & Louviere, J 2002, 'Choice Modelling and Tests of Benefit Transfer', American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 161-170.

Choice Modelling and Tests of Benefit Transfer. / Morrison, Mark; Bennett, Jeff; Blamey, Russell; Louviere, Jordan.

In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 84, No. 1, 2002, p. 161-170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Choice Modelling and Tests of Benefit Transfer

AU - Morrison, Mark

AU - Bennett, Jeff

AU - Blamey, Russell

AU - Louviere, Jordan

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = American Journal of Agricultural Economics. ISSNs: 0002-9092;

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Benefit transfer is increasingly being used by decision makers as a way of estimating environmental values suitable for use in benefit cost analysis. However, recent studies examining the validity of benefit transfer of passive use values estimated using contingent valuation have rejected the hypothesis of convergent validity. In this article, we demonstrate the usage of a form of conjoint analysis known as choice modeling for benefit transfer. Choice modeling has been touted as being particularly suitable for benefit transfer because it is possible to allow for differences in environmental quality and socioeconomic characteristics when transferring benefit estimates. We demonstrate that choice modeling is suitable for benefit transfer, particularly when the transfers involve implicit prices. Second, we examine the circumstances in which benefit transfer of choice modeling derived value estimates is likely to be most valid. Two split sample tests were undertaken to achieve this objective. The evidence from these tests indicates that transfers across different case study sites are likely to be subject to less error than those across different populations.

AB - Benefit transfer is increasingly being used by decision makers as a way of estimating environmental values suitable for use in benefit cost analysis. However, recent studies examining the validity of benefit transfer of passive use values estimated using contingent valuation have rejected the hypothesis of convergent validity. In this article, we demonstrate the usage of a form of conjoint analysis known as choice modeling for benefit transfer. Choice modeling has been touted as being particularly suitable for benefit transfer because it is possible to allow for differences in environmental quality and socioeconomic characteristics when transferring benefit estimates. We demonstrate that choice modeling is suitable for benefit transfer, particularly when the transfers involve implicit prices. Second, we examine the circumstances in which benefit transfer of choice modeling derived value estimates is likely to be most valid. Two split sample tests were undertaken to achieve this objective. The evidence from these tests indicates that transfers across different case study sites are likely to be subject to less error than those across different populations.

M3 - Article

VL - 84

SP - 161

EP - 170

JO - American Journal of Agricultural Economics

JF - American Journal of Agricultural Economics

SN - 0002-9092

IS - 1

ER -