TY - JOUR
T1 - Climate change and water security
T2 - Challenges for adaptive water management
AU - Allan, Catherine
AU - Xia, Jun
AU - Pahl-Wostl, Claudia
N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = December, 2013; Journal title (773t) = Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. ISSNs: 1877-3435;
PY - 2013/12
Y1 - 2013/12
N2 - Water security is a key policy area for the Anthropocene; here we consider recent discourses of adaptive management in relation to water security. Definitions of water security emphasise the dual productive/destructive potentials of water, indicating its inherent economic, social and environmental complexity. Adaptive management has potential to address this social-ecological complexity because it supports a holistic approach. Although adaptive management is sometimes reduced to little more than conventional action under a new name, the potential for integrative, holistic, learning centred approaches remains within the concept of adaptation, and in the complementary conceptualisations of Integrated Water Resources Management, Social Learning and Resilience Thinking. Linking across policy fields (the water-food-energy-nexus) can only be achieved by these types of adaptive flexible and reflective approaches, and there is some, albeit tentative, moves in this direction in China's National Water Policy, the European Flood Directive and Australia's Murray-Darling Basin Plan. There is, however, much to do before water security, under an adaptive paradigm, becomes a concept and institutionalised practice that is continuously re-viewed and re-constructed to meet the needs of an ever changing world.
AB - Water security is a key policy area for the Anthropocene; here we consider recent discourses of adaptive management in relation to water security. Definitions of water security emphasise the dual productive/destructive potentials of water, indicating its inherent economic, social and environmental complexity. Adaptive management has potential to address this social-ecological complexity because it supports a holistic approach. Although adaptive management is sometimes reduced to little more than conventional action under a new name, the potential for integrative, holistic, learning centred approaches remains within the concept of adaptation, and in the complementary conceptualisations of Integrated Water Resources Management, Social Learning and Resilience Thinking. Linking across policy fields (the water-food-energy-nexus) can only be achieved by these types of adaptive flexible and reflective approaches, and there is some, albeit tentative, moves in this direction in China's National Water Policy, the European Flood Directive and Australia's Murray-Darling Basin Plan. There is, however, much to do before water security, under an adaptive paradigm, becomes a concept and institutionalised practice that is continuously re-viewed and re-constructed to meet the needs of an ever changing world.
KW - Adaptive management
KW - Water security
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890142600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890142600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.09.004
DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.09.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84890142600
SN - 1877-3435
VL - 5
SP - 625
EP - 632
JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
IS - 6
ER -