Climate justice beyond international burden sharing

Steven Vanderheiden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Climate justice scholars have in recent years devoted considerable attention to the development and application of justice principles and frameworks to the architecture of global climate change mitigation and adaptation efforts. The resulting scholarly literature is now rife with burden-sharing or resource sharing mitigation prescriptions that call for far more aggressive actions than are ever considered as viable policy options, along with proposals for singular or hybrid principles for assigning adaptation liability that follow sound normative analyses but have gained little traction among policymakers. With their gaze fixed primarily upon macro-level substantive policy outcomes, scholars have paid less attention to the way that justice might be applied at other levels of analysis and operationalized through the institutions of international climate policy development and implementation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-42
Number of pages16
JournalMidwest Studies in Philosophy
Volume40
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Climate justice beyond international burden sharing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this