TY - JOUR
T1 - Cognitive behaviour therapy for social anxiety disorder
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating different treatment formats
AU - Hall, Matthew
AU - Luo, Aileen
AU - Bhullar, Navjot
AU - Moses, Karen
AU - Wootton, Bethany M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Objective: Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for social anxiety disorder (SAD) can be delivered through several modalities, including individually-administered CBT (ICBT), group-based CBT (GCBT), and CBT delivered remotely (RCBT). We synthesised the current literature on ICBT, GCBT, and RCBT approaches in adults with SAD, and compared their relative effectiveness using a meta-analytic approach. Method: This review included randomised controlled trials comparing a disorder specific CBT monotherapy (ICBT, GCBT, or RCBT) to a non-active control group in adults with diagnosed SAD. Eligible studies were searched through PsycINFO, Scopus, and EMBASE databases to April 2023. A total of 37 studies met the inclusion criteria (with 55 between-group comparisons; N = 3234). Between-group effect sizes were conducted using random effects models. Results: Analyses indicated that RCBT (k = 23; g = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.74–1.06) and ICBT (k = 17; g = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.66–1.23) demonstrated large effects, while GCBT demonstrated medium effects (k = 15; g = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.49–0.94). The groups, however, did not differ significantly (Q2 = 2.17, p >.05). Conclusions: This study builds on the existing literature demonstrating the efficacy of these treatment approaches.
AB - Objective: Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for social anxiety disorder (SAD) can be delivered through several modalities, including individually-administered CBT (ICBT), group-based CBT (GCBT), and CBT delivered remotely (RCBT). We synthesised the current literature on ICBT, GCBT, and RCBT approaches in adults with SAD, and compared their relative effectiveness using a meta-analytic approach. Method: This review included randomised controlled trials comparing a disorder specific CBT monotherapy (ICBT, GCBT, or RCBT) to a non-active control group in adults with diagnosed SAD. Eligible studies were searched through PsycINFO, Scopus, and EMBASE databases to April 2023. A total of 37 studies met the inclusion criteria (with 55 between-group comparisons; N = 3234). Between-group effect sizes were conducted using random effects models. Results: Analyses indicated that RCBT (k = 23; g = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.74–1.06) and ICBT (k = 17; g = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.66–1.23) demonstrated large effects, while GCBT demonstrated medium effects (k = 15; g = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.49–0.94). The groups, however, did not differ significantly (Q2 = 2.17, p >.05). Conclusions: This study builds on the existing literature demonstrating the efficacy of these treatment approaches.
KW - CBT
KW - meta-analysis
KW - Social anxiety disorder
KW - social phobia
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105001967046
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105001967046#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1080/00050067.2024.2356804
DO - 10.1080/00050067.2024.2356804
M3 - Review article
SN - 0005-0067
VL - 60
SP - 1
EP - 14
JO - Australian Psychologist
JF - Australian Psychologist
IS - 1
ER -