Community forestry, rural livelihoods and poverty reduction in Nepal

Binod Devkota, Richard Thwaites, Digby Race

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperChapter (peer-reviewed)

Abstract

The community forests of Nepal are important natural resources for supporting rural livelihoods. Case studies in three districts in Nepal indicate that there has been an overall improvement in the forest condition and economic status of Community Forest User Groups (CFUGs), but not necessarily an improvement in the social well-being of all individuals, especially poor and disadvantaged families. Therefore, a focus on the biophysical outcomes of community forestry (CF) can be misleading in terms of improvements in social outcomes. Investment in CF focused on creating positive biophysical changes may not lead to similarly positive social or well-being outcomes. Indeed, in some circumstances, investment in the biophysical aspect of CF may be at the expense of desired social outcomes, and can even entrench social inequity at the local level. Therefore, policies designed to support CF need to evolve to be more supportive of pro-poor enterprise development and better targeted to enable marginalized people to benefit.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCommunity Forestry in Nepal
Subtitle of host publicationAdapting to a Changing World
EditorsRichard Thwaites, Robert Fisher, Mohan Poudel
Place of PublicationOxon, UK
PublisherTaylor & Francis
Chapter4
Pages59-81
Number of pages23
ISBN (Electronic)9781315445168
ISBN (Print)9781138214620
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

community forestry
Forestry
Nepal
Rural Population
Poverty
poverty
livelihood
forest communities
Vulnerable Populations
Natural resources
socioeconomic status
natural resources
Economics
case studies
Forests
Industry

Cite this

Devkota, B., Thwaites, R., & Race, D. (2018). Community forestry, rural livelihoods and poverty reduction in Nepal. In R. Thwaites, R. Fisher, & M. Poudel (Eds.), Community Forestry in Nepal: Adapting to a Changing World (pp. 59-81). Oxon, UK: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315445168
Devkota, Binod ; Thwaites, Richard ; Race, Digby. / Community forestry, rural livelihoods and poverty reduction in Nepal. Community Forestry in Nepal: Adapting to a Changing World. editor / Richard Thwaites ; Robert Fisher ; Mohan Poudel. Oxon, UK : Taylor & Francis, 2018. pp. 59-81
@inbook{fae7e81ed2ee463495202332cf92ca9e,
title = "Community forestry, rural livelihoods and poverty reduction in Nepal",
abstract = "The community forests of Nepal are important natural resources for supporting rural livelihoods. Case studies in three districts in Nepal indicate that there has been an overall improvement in the forest condition and economic status of Community Forest User Groups (CFUGs), but not necessarily an improvement in the social well-being of all individuals, especially poor and disadvantaged families. Therefore, a focus on the biophysical outcomes of community forestry (CF) can be misleading in terms of improvements in social outcomes. Investment in CF focused on creating positive biophysical changes may not lead to similarly positive social or well-being outcomes. Indeed, in some circumstances, investment in the biophysical aspect of CF may be at the expense of desired social outcomes, and can even entrench social inequity at the local level. Therefore, policies designed to support CF need to evolve to be more supportive of pro-poor enterprise development and better targeted to enable marginalized people to benefit.",
author = "Binod Devkota and Richard Thwaites and Digby Race",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.4324/9781315445168",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138214620",
pages = "59--81",
editor = "Richard Thwaites and Robert Fisher and Mohan Poudel",
booktitle = "Community Forestry in Nepal",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
address = "United States",

}

Devkota, B, Thwaites, R & Race, D 2018, Community forestry, rural livelihoods and poverty reduction in Nepal. in R Thwaites, R Fisher & M Poudel (eds), Community Forestry in Nepal: Adapting to a Changing World. Taylor & Francis, Oxon, UK, pp. 59-81. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315445168

Community forestry, rural livelihoods and poverty reduction in Nepal. / Devkota, Binod; Thwaites, Richard; Race, Digby.

Community Forestry in Nepal: Adapting to a Changing World. ed. / Richard Thwaites; Robert Fisher; Mohan Poudel. Oxon, UK : Taylor & Francis, 2018. p. 59-81.

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperChapter (peer-reviewed)

TY - CHAP

T1 - Community forestry, rural livelihoods and poverty reduction in Nepal

AU - Devkota, Binod

AU - Thwaites, Richard

AU - Race, Digby

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The community forests of Nepal are important natural resources for supporting rural livelihoods. Case studies in three districts in Nepal indicate that there has been an overall improvement in the forest condition and economic status of Community Forest User Groups (CFUGs), but not necessarily an improvement in the social well-being of all individuals, especially poor and disadvantaged families. Therefore, a focus on the biophysical outcomes of community forestry (CF) can be misleading in terms of improvements in social outcomes. Investment in CF focused on creating positive biophysical changes may not lead to similarly positive social or well-being outcomes. Indeed, in some circumstances, investment in the biophysical aspect of CF may be at the expense of desired social outcomes, and can even entrench social inequity at the local level. Therefore, policies designed to support CF need to evolve to be more supportive of pro-poor enterprise development and better targeted to enable marginalized people to benefit.

AB - The community forests of Nepal are important natural resources for supporting rural livelihoods. Case studies in three districts in Nepal indicate that there has been an overall improvement in the forest condition and economic status of Community Forest User Groups (CFUGs), but not necessarily an improvement in the social well-being of all individuals, especially poor and disadvantaged families. Therefore, a focus on the biophysical outcomes of community forestry (CF) can be misleading in terms of improvements in social outcomes. Investment in CF focused on creating positive biophysical changes may not lead to similarly positive social or well-being outcomes. Indeed, in some circumstances, investment in the biophysical aspect of CF may be at the expense of desired social outcomes, and can even entrench social inequity at the local level. Therefore, policies designed to support CF need to evolve to be more supportive of pro-poor enterprise development and better targeted to enable marginalized people to benefit.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044249277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315445168

DO - 10.4324/9781315445168

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

AN - SCOPUS:85044249277

SN - 9781138214620

SP - 59

EP - 81

BT - Community Forestry in Nepal

A2 - Thwaites, Richard

A2 - Fisher, Robert

A2 - Poudel, Mohan

PB - Taylor & Francis

CY - Oxon, UK

ER -

Devkota B, Thwaites R, Race D. Community forestry, rural livelihoods and poverty reduction in Nepal. In Thwaites R, Fisher R, Poudel M, editors, Community Forestry in Nepal: Adapting to a Changing World. Oxon, UK: Taylor & Francis. 2018. p. 59-81 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315445168