Comparison of methods to elicit stakeholder preferences for multi-criteria decision analysis in the context of disease prioritisation

Research output: Other contribution to conferencePoster

Abstract

Disease prioritisation is a decision analysis problem; somehow, the differing opinions of stakeholders need to be balanced to reach a decision acceptable to the group. Multi-criteria decision analysis methods offer quantitative, repeatable decision making solutions. By dividing the problem into measurable criteria on which stakeholders base their decision, subjective stakeholder preferences can be modelled as weights of importance for the criteria. Aggregation of weights with objective disease measurements for the criteria provides an overall disease score, weighted to reflect stakeholder preferences.
Original languageEnglish
Pages391
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Event13th International Symposium on Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics: ISVEE 2012 - Maastricht, Netherlands
Duration: 20 Aug 201225 Aug 2012
https://orbit.dtu.dk/fedora/objects/orbit:123085/datastreams/file_85fd15d8-5f16-4fc5-a125-caddfb9009a9/content

Conference

Conference13th International Symposium on Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics
CountryNetherlands
City Maastricht
Period20/08/1225/08/12
Internet address

    Fingerprint

Cite this

Brookes, V., Hernandez-Jover, M., Cowled, B., Holyoake, T., & Ward, M. (2012). Comparison of methods to elicit stakeholder preferences for multi-criteria decision analysis in the context of disease prioritisation. 391. Poster session presented at 13th International Symposium on Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Maastricht, Netherlands.