Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 391 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
| Event | 13th International Symposium on Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics: ISVEE 2012 - Maastricht, Netherlands Duration: 20 Aug 2012 → 25 Aug 2012 https://orbit.dtu.dk/fedora/objects/orbit:123085/datastreams/file_85fd15d8-5f16-4fc5-a125-caddfb9009a9/content |
Conference
| Conference | 13th International Symposium on Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics |
|---|---|
| Country | Netherlands |
| City | Maastricht |
| Period | 20/08/12 → 25/08/12 |
| Internet address |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
Comparison of methods to elicit stakeholder preferences for multi-criteria decision analysis in the context of disease prioritisation. / Brookes, Victoria; Hernandez-Jover, Marta; Cowled, B; Holyoake, Trish; Ward, Michael.
2012. 391 Poster session presented at 13th International Symposium on Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Maastricht, Netherlands.Research output: Other contribution to conference › Poster
TY - CONF
T1 - Comparison of methods to elicit stakeholder preferences for multi-criteria decision analysis in the context of disease prioritisation
AU - Brookes, Victoria
AU - Hernandez-Jover, Marta
AU - Cowled, B
AU - Holyoake, Trish
AU - Ward, Michael
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Disease prioritisation is a decision analysis problem; somehow, the differing opinions of stakeholders need to be balanced to reach a decision acceptable to the group. Multi-criteria decision analysis methods offer quantitative, repeatable decision making solutions. By dividing the problem into measurable criteria on which stakeholders base their decision, subjective stakeholder preferences can be modelled as weights of importance for the criteria. Aggregation of weights with objective disease measurements for the criteria provides an overall disease score, weighted to reflect stakeholder preferences.
AB - Disease prioritisation is a decision analysis problem; somehow, the differing opinions of stakeholders need to be balanced to reach a decision acceptable to the group. Multi-criteria decision analysis methods offer quantitative, repeatable decision making solutions. By dividing the problem into measurable criteria on which stakeholders base their decision, subjective stakeholder preferences can be modelled as weights of importance for the criteria. Aggregation of weights with objective disease measurements for the criteria provides an overall disease score, weighted to reflect stakeholder preferences.
UR - https://orbit.dtu.dk/fedora/objects/orbit:123085/datastreams/file_85fd15d8-5f16-4fc5-a125-caddfb9009a9/content
M3 - Poster
SP - 391
ER -