Condliff v North Staffordshire Primary Care Trust: Can human rights redress inequities in United Kingdom and Australian cost-containment-driven health care reforms?

Ruth Townsend; Thomas Faunce

Condliff v North Staffordshire Primary Care Trust: Can human rights redress inequities in United Kingdom and Australian cost-containment-driven health care reforms?

Ruth Townsend, Thomas Faunce

Nursing, Paramedicine and Healthcare Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Journal	Journal of Law and Medicine
Volume	19
Issue number	2
Publication status	Published - 2011

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Cite this

@article{40b2d9175bc7482b8d3cc8ba5650a1a5,

title = "Condliff v North Staffordshire Primary Care Trust: Can human rights redress inequities in United Kingdom and Australian cost-containment-driven health care reforms? ",

author = "Ruth Townsend and Thomas Faunce",

note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Journal of Law and Medicine. ISSNs: 1320-159X; ",

year = "2011",

language = "English",

volume = "19",

journal = "Journal of Law and Medicine",

issn = "1320-159X",

publisher = "Thomson Head Office",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Condliff v North Staffordshire Primary Care Trust

T2 - Can human rights redress inequities in United Kingdom and Australian cost-containment-driven health care reforms?

AU - Townsend, Ruth

AU - Faunce, Thomas

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Journal of Law and Medicine. ISSNs: 1320-159X;

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

M3 - Article

VL - 19

JO - Journal of Law and Medicine

JF - Journal of Law and Medicine

SN - 1320-159X

IS - 2

ER -