Confidence of older Eeyewitnesses: Is it diagnostic of identification accuracy?

Natalie Martschuk, Siegfried Sporer, Melanie Sauerland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Since the late 1980s evidence has been accumulating that confidence recorded at the time of identification is a reliable postdictor of eyewitness identification. Nonetheless, there may be noteworthy exceptions. In a re-analysis of a field study by Sauerland and Sporer (2009; N = 720; n = 436 choosers between 15 and 83 years old) we show that the postdictive value of confidence was reduced for participants aged 40 years or older. Different calibration indices and Bayesian analyses demonstrate a progressive dissociation between identification performance and confidence across age groups. While the confidence expressed following an identification remained unchanged across the lifespan, identification accuracy decreased. Young, highly confident witnesses were much more likely to be accurate than less confident witnesses. With increasing age, witnesses were more likely to be overconfident, particularly at the medium and high levels of confidence, and the postdictive value of confidence and decision times decreased. We conclude that witness age may be an important moderator to take into account when evaluating identification evidence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)132-151
Number of pages20
JournalOpen Psychology Journal
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 04 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Bayes Theorem
Calibration
Age Groups

Cite this

Martschuk, Natalie ; Sporer, Siegfried ; Sauerland, Melanie. / Confidence of older Eeyewitnesses : Is it diagnostic of identification accuracy?. In: Open Psychology Journal. 2019 ; Vol. 1, No. 1. pp. 132-151.
@article{f598f6b2018247cbb055307a930f801f,
title = "Confidence of older Eeyewitnesses: Is it diagnostic of identification accuracy?",
abstract = "Since the late 1980s evidence has been accumulating that confidence recorded at the time of identification is a reliable postdictor of eyewitness identification. Nonetheless, there may be noteworthy exceptions. In a re-analysis of a field study by Sauerland and Sporer (2009; N = 720; n = 436 choosers between 15 and 83 years old) we show that the postdictive value of confidence was reduced for participants aged 40 years or older. Different calibration indices and Bayesian analyses demonstrate a progressive dissociation between identification performance and confidence across age groups. While the confidence expressed following an identification remained unchanged across the lifespan, identification accuracy decreased. Young, highly confident witnesses were much more likely to be accurate than less confident witnesses. With increasing age, witnesses were more likely to be overconfident, particularly at the medium and high levels of confidence, and the postdictive value of confidence and decision times decreased. We conclude that witness age may be an important moderator to take into account when evaluating identification evidence.",
keywords = "eyewitness identification, confidence-accuracy relationship, elderly eyewitness, lineup",
author = "Natalie Martschuk and Siegfried Sporer and Melanie Sauerland",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1515/psych-2018-0010",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "132--151",
journal = "Open Psychology Journal",
issn = "1874-3501",
publisher = "Bentham Science Publishers",
number = "1",

}

Confidence of older Eeyewitnesses : Is it diagnostic of identification accuracy? / Martschuk, Natalie; Sporer, Siegfried; Sauerland, Melanie.

In: Open Psychology Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, 04.04.2019, p. 132-151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Confidence of older Eeyewitnesses

T2 - Is it diagnostic of identification accuracy?

AU - Martschuk, Natalie

AU - Sporer, Siegfried

AU - Sauerland, Melanie

PY - 2019/4/4

Y1 - 2019/4/4

N2 - Since the late 1980s evidence has been accumulating that confidence recorded at the time of identification is a reliable postdictor of eyewitness identification. Nonetheless, there may be noteworthy exceptions. In a re-analysis of a field study by Sauerland and Sporer (2009; N = 720; n = 436 choosers between 15 and 83 years old) we show that the postdictive value of confidence was reduced for participants aged 40 years or older. Different calibration indices and Bayesian analyses demonstrate a progressive dissociation between identification performance and confidence across age groups. While the confidence expressed following an identification remained unchanged across the lifespan, identification accuracy decreased. Young, highly confident witnesses were much more likely to be accurate than less confident witnesses. With increasing age, witnesses were more likely to be overconfident, particularly at the medium and high levels of confidence, and the postdictive value of confidence and decision times decreased. We conclude that witness age may be an important moderator to take into account when evaluating identification evidence.

AB - Since the late 1980s evidence has been accumulating that confidence recorded at the time of identification is a reliable postdictor of eyewitness identification. Nonetheless, there may be noteworthy exceptions. In a re-analysis of a field study by Sauerland and Sporer (2009; N = 720; n = 436 choosers between 15 and 83 years old) we show that the postdictive value of confidence was reduced for participants aged 40 years or older. Different calibration indices and Bayesian analyses demonstrate a progressive dissociation between identification performance and confidence across age groups. While the confidence expressed following an identification remained unchanged across the lifespan, identification accuracy decreased. Young, highly confident witnesses were much more likely to be accurate than less confident witnesses. With increasing age, witnesses were more likely to be overconfident, particularly at the medium and high levels of confidence, and the postdictive value of confidence and decision times decreased. We conclude that witness age may be an important moderator to take into account when evaluating identification evidence.

KW - eyewitness identification

KW - confidence-accuracy relationship

KW - elderly eyewitness

KW - lineup

U2 - 10.1515/psych-2018-0010

DO - 10.1515/psych-2018-0010

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 132

EP - 151

JO - Open Psychology Journal

JF - Open Psychology Journal

SN - 1874-3501

IS - 1

ER -