Confidence of older eyewitnesses: Is it diagnostic of identification accuracy?

Natalie Martschuk, Siegfried Sporer, Melanie Sauerland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Downloads (Pure)


Since the late 1980s evidence has been accumulating that confidence recorded at the time of identification is a reliable postdictor of eyewitness identification. Nonetheless, there may be noteworthy exceptions. In a re-analysis of a field study by Sauerland and Sporer (2009; N = 720; n = 436 choosers between 15 and 83 years old) we show that the postdictive value of confidence was reduced for participants aged 40 years or older. Different calibration indices and Bayesian analyses demonstrate a progressive dissociation between identification performance and confidence across age groups. While the confidence expressed following an identification remained unchanged across the lifespan, identification accuracy decreased. Young, highly confident witnesses were much more likely to be accurate than less confident witnesses. With increasing age, witnesses were more likely to be overconfident, particularly at the medium and high levels of confidence, and the postdictive value of confidence and decision times decreased. We conclude that witness age may be an important moderator to take into account when evaluating identification evidence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)132-151
Number of pages20
JournalOpen Psychology Journal
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 04 Apr 2019

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Confidence of older eyewitnesses: Is it diagnostic of identification accuracy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this