TY - JOUR
T1 - Cost-effectiveness of community diabetes screening
T2 - Application of Akaike information criterion in rural communities of Nigeria
AU - Anyasodor, Anayochukwu Edward
AU - Nwose, Ezekiel Uba
AU - Bwititi, Phillip Taderera
AU - Richards, Ross Stuart
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Anyasodor, Nwose, Bwititi and Richards.
PY - 2022/7/25
Y1 - 2022/7/25
N2 - Background: The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) is increasing globally, and this requires several approaches to screening. There are reports of alternative indices for prediction of DM, besides fasting blood glucose (FBG) level. This study, investigated the ability of combination of biochemical and anthropometric parameters and orodental disease indicators (ODIs) to generate models for DM prediction, using Akaike information criterion (AIC) to substantiate health economics of diabetes screening. Methods: Four hundred and thirty-three subjects were enrolled in the study in Ndokwa communities, Delta State, Nigeria, and their glycaemic status was determined, using the CardioChek analyser ® and previous data from the Prediabetes and Cardiovascular Complications Study were also used. The cost of screening for diabetes (NGN 300 = $0.72) in a not-for-profit organization/hospital was used as basis to calculate the health economics of number of individuals with DM in 1,000 participants. Data on the subjects' anthropometric, biochemical and ODI parameters were used to generate different models, using R statistical software (version 4.0.0). The different models were evaluated for their AIC values. Lowest AIC was considered as best model. Microsoft Excel software (version 2020) was used in preliminary analysis. Result: The cost of identifying 34, hence considered as not recommendable. Conclusion: The cost of general screening for diabetes in rural communities may appear high and burdensome in terms of health economics. However, the use of prediction models involving AIC is of value in terms of cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness to the healthcare consumers, which favors health economics.
AB - Background: The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) is increasing globally, and this requires several approaches to screening. There are reports of alternative indices for prediction of DM, besides fasting blood glucose (FBG) level. This study, investigated the ability of combination of biochemical and anthropometric parameters and orodental disease indicators (ODIs) to generate models for DM prediction, using Akaike information criterion (AIC) to substantiate health economics of diabetes screening. Methods: Four hundred and thirty-three subjects were enrolled in the study in Ndokwa communities, Delta State, Nigeria, and their glycaemic status was determined, using the CardioChek analyser ® and previous data from the Prediabetes and Cardiovascular Complications Study were also used. The cost of screening for diabetes (NGN 300 = $0.72) in a not-for-profit organization/hospital was used as basis to calculate the health economics of number of individuals with DM in 1,000 participants. Data on the subjects' anthropometric, biochemical and ODI parameters were used to generate different models, using R statistical software (version 4.0.0). The different models were evaluated for their AIC values. Lowest AIC was considered as best model. Microsoft Excel software (version 2020) was used in preliminary analysis. Result: The cost of identifying 34, hence considered as not recommendable. Conclusion: The cost of general screening for diabetes in rural communities may appear high and burdensome in terms of health economics. However, the use of prediction models involving AIC is of value in terms of cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness to the healthcare consumers, which favors health economics.
KW - Akaike information criterion
KW - diabetes
KW - fasting blood glucose
KW - Nigeria
KW - prediabetes
KW - screening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136341237&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85136341237&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpubh.2022.932631
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2022.932631
M3 - Article
C2 - 35958851
SN - 2296-2565
VL - 10
JO - Frontiers in Public Health
JF - Frontiers in Public Health
IS - 932631
M1 - 932631
ER -