Abstract
170 early career researchers interviewed three times over 2 years, have uniquely contributed towards a stress test of scholarly communications and cracks have been identified. The perfect storm created by the convergence of millennial values and the pandemic appears to have fast-forwarded the cracking process, perhaps, for the good. The cracks in question are: (1) peer review; (2) reputational assessment; (3) unethical/questionable practices; (4) collaboration; (5) networking.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 319-322 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Learned Publishing |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | Mar 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2023 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '‘Cracks’ in the scholarly communications system: Insights from a longitudinal international study of early career researchers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver