TY - JOUR
T1 - Creating spaces for critical transformative dialogues
T2 - Legitimising discussion groups as professional practice
AU - Edwards-Groves, Christine
N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Australian Journal of Teacher Education. ISSNs: 1835-517X;
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Focused dialogue (as lived and living practices) can have a powerful role in renewing professional practice, advancing its sustainability and development as administrative and political systems colonise the practices of teachers and teacher educators. However, participating in discussion groups for many teachers, including those in academia, is often constrained by time demands, workplace structures and accountabilities. This paper reports a two year empirical case study investigating the transformative nature of dialogues experienced in one such focused discussion group. The dialogic practices of the group aimed firstly to provide a communicative space for its participants to interrogate and interpret factors which enable and constrain teaching and research practices; secondly, to critique practices as a form of collective professional learning; and thirdly, to study the educational practices of its members from within their own practice tradition. To do this it describes the nature of discussion groups. Findings reveal that creating communicative space for discussion enables professional learning and agency through critical and transformative dialogues.
AB - Focused dialogue (as lived and living practices) can have a powerful role in renewing professional practice, advancing its sustainability and development as administrative and political systems colonise the practices of teachers and teacher educators. However, participating in discussion groups for many teachers, including those in academia, is often constrained by time demands, workplace structures and accountabilities. This paper reports a two year empirical case study investigating the transformative nature of dialogues experienced in one such focused discussion group. The dialogic practices of the group aimed firstly to provide a communicative space for its participants to interrogate and interpret factors which enable and constrain teaching and research practices; secondly, to critique practices as a form of collective professional learning; and thirdly, to study the educational practices of its members from within their own practice tradition. To do this it describes the nature of discussion groups. Findings reveal that creating communicative space for discussion enables professional learning and agency through critical and transformative dialogues.
KW - Open access version available
KW - Agency
KW - Collaborative
KW - Critical transformative dialogues
KW - Groups
KW - Practice theory
KW - Transformation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886842751&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886842751&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14221/ajte.2013v38n12.1
DO - 10.14221/ajte.2013v38n12.1
M3 - Article
SN - 0313-5373
VL - 38
SP - 17
EP - 34
JO - Australian Journal of Teacher Education
JF - Australian Journal of Teacher Education
IS - 12
M1 - Article 2
ER -