Critical community psychology: What, why and how?

David Fryer, Paul Duckett, Rebekah Pratt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We are differently positioned - amongst many other ways - in terms of gender, sexual orientation, impairment, social class, age, academic seniority, income and employment security. We have areas of intellectual consensus and areas of difference. We are not clones of each other. On some issues we are united; on others we align ourselves differently. We are critical of each other's work but because we share some key values and ideological positions, we regard each other's critical relfection on our work as a sign that our work is being taken seriously by people whose views we value, who are working towards the same broader goals as we are and whose feedback is based on foundations with which we, broadly, are comfortable. We are all three engaged in critical community psychology.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-43
Number of pages5
JournalClinical psychology forum
Volume38
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Social Class
Sexual Behavior
Consensus
Clone Cells
Psychology

Cite this

Fryer, D., Duckett, P., & Pratt, R. (2004). Critical community psychology: What, why and how? Clinical psychology forum, 38, 39-43.
Fryer, David ; Duckett, Paul ; Pratt, Rebekah. / Critical community psychology : What, why and how?. In: Clinical psychology forum. 2004 ; Vol. 38. pp. 39-43.
@article{15d18b88bdf448dd9aca70b8b4e99225,
title = "Critical community psychology: What, why and how?",
abstract = "We are differently positioned - amongst many other ways - in terms of gender, sexual orientation, impairment, social class, age, academic seniority, income and employment security. We have areas of intellectual consensus and areas of difference. We are not clones of each other. On some issues we are united; on others we align ourselves differently. We are critical of each other's work but because we share some key values and ideological positions, we regard each other's critical relfection on our work as a sign that our work is being taken seriously by people whose views we value, who are working towards the same broader goals as we are and whose feedback is based on foundations with which we, broadly, are comfortable. We are all three engaged in critical community psychology.",
author = "David Fryer and Paul Duckett and Rebekah Pratt",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Clinical Psychology Forum. ISSNs: 1473-8279;",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "39--43",
journal = "Clinical psychology forum",
issn = "1747-5732",
publisher = "British Psychological Society",

}

Fryer, D, Duckett, P & Pratt, R 2004, 'Critical community psychology: What, why and how?', Clinical psychology forum, vol. 38, pp. 39-43.

Critical community psychology : What, why and how? / Fryer, David; Duckett, Paul; Pratt, Rebekah.

In: Clinical psychology forum, Vol. 38, 2004, p. 39-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical community psychology

T2 - What, why and how?

AU - Fryer, David

AU - Duckett, Paul

AU - Pratt, Rebekah

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Clinical Psychology Forum. ISSNs: 1473-8279;

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - We are differently positioned - amongst many other ways - in terms of gender, sexual orientation, impairment, social class, age, academic seniority, income and employment security. We have areas of intellectual consensus and areas of difference. We are not clones of each other. On some issues we are united; on others we align ourselves differently. We are critical of each other's work but because we share some key values and ideological positions, we regard each other's critical relfection on our work as a sign that our work is being taken seriously by people whose views we value, who are working towards the same broader goals as we are and whose feedback is based on foundations with which we, broadly, are comfortable. We are all three engaged in critical community psychology.

AB - We are differently positioned - amongst many other ways - in terms of gender, sexual orientation, impairment, social class, age, academic seniority, income and employment security. We have areas of intellectual consensus and areas of difference. We are not clones of each other. On some issues we are united; on others we align ourselves differently. We are critical of each other's work but because we share some key values and ideological positions, we regard each other's critical relfection on our work as a sign that our work is being taken seriously by people whose views we value, who are working towards the same broader goals as we are and whose feedback is based on foundations with which we, broadly, are comfortable. We are all three engaged in critical community psychology.

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 39

EP - 43

JO - Clinical psychology forum

JF - Clinical psychology forum

SN - 1747-5732

ER -